rename elem_of_equiv -> set_equiv and set_equiv_spec -> set_equiv_subseteq, and rename some instances to get out of the way

Fix in preparation for https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/13188

and `dom_map_filter_subseteq` → `dom_filter_subseteq` for consistency's sake.

This was pointed out by @atrieu in iris/stdpp!175 (comment 53746)

This follows iris!387
This closes issue #54.

Dan Frumin authored 5 years ago and Robbert Krebbers committed 5 years ago

In accordance with
<!93>

There are not documented in
https://coq.inria.fr/refman/addendum/type-classes.html?highlight=class#coq:cmd.class,
and they don't have any advantage, so it's better to stop using them.

Get rid of using `Collection` and favor `set` everywhere. Also, prefer conversion
functions that are called `X_to_Y`.

The following sed script performs most of the renaming, with the exception of:

- `set`, which has been renamed into `propset`. I couldn't do this rename
  using `sed` since it's too context sensitive.
- There was a spurious rename of `Vec.of_list`, which I correctly manually.
- Updating some section names and comments.

```
sed '
s/SimpleCollection/SemiSet/g;
s/FinCollection/FinSet/g;
s/CollectionMonad/MonadSet/g;
s/Collection/Set\_/g;
s/collection\_simple/set\_semi\_set/g;
s/fin\_collection/fin\_set/g;
s/collection\_monad\_simple/monad\_set\_semi\_set/g;
s/collection\_equiv/set\_equiv/g;
s/\bbset/boolset/g;
s/mkBSet/BoolSet/g;
s/mkSet/PropSet/g;
s/set\_equivalence/set\_equiv\_equivalence/g;
s/collection\_subseteq/set\_subseteq/g;
s/collection\_disjoint/set\_disjoint/g;
s/collection\_fold/set\_fold/g;
s/collection\_map/set\_map/g;
s/collection\_size/set\_size/g;
s/collection\_filter/set\_filter/g;
s/collection\_guard/set\_guard/g;
s/collection\_choose/set\_choose/g;
s/collection\_ind/set\_ind/g;
s/collection\_wf/set\_wf/g;
s/map\_to\_collection/map\_to\_set/g;
s/map\_of\_collection/set\_to\_map/g;
s/map\_of\_list/list\_to\_map/g;
s/map\_of\_to_list/list\_to\_map\_to\_list/g;
s/map\_to\_of\_list/map\_to\_list\_to\_map/g;
s/\bof\_list/list\_to\_set/g;
s/\bof\_option/option\_to\_set/g;
s/elem\_of\_of\_list/elem\_of\_list\_to\_set/g;
s/elem\_of\_of\_option/elem\_of\_option\_to\_set/g;
s/collection\_not\_subset\_inv/set\_not\_subset\_inv/g;
s/seq\_set/set\_seq/g;
s/collections/sets/g;
s/collection/set/g;
' -i $(find -name "*.v")
```

This way, type class search will fail immediately on first type
class constraint of any of the `fin_map_dom` lemmas if no `Dom`
can be found.

This provides significant robustness against looping type class search.

As a consequence, at many places throughout the library we had to add
additional typing information to lemmas. This was to be expected, since
most of the old lemmas were ambiguous. For example:

  Section fin_collection.
    Context `{FinCollection A C}.

    size_singleton (x : A) : size {[ x ]} = 1.

In this case, the lemma does not tell us which `FinCollection` with
elements `A` we are talking about. So, `{[ x ]}` could not only refer to
the singleton operation of the `FinCollection A C` in the section, but
also to any other `FinCollection` in the development. To make this lemma
unambigious, it should be written as:

  Lemma size_singleton (x : A) : size ({[ x ]} : C) = 1.

In similar spirit, lemmas like the one below were also ambiguous:

  Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) m i j :
    alter f i m !! j = None  m !! j = None.

It is not clear which finite map implementation we are talking about.
To make this lemma unambigious, it should be written as:

  Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A → A) (m : M A) i j :
    alter f i m !! j = None  m !! j = None.

That is, we have to specify the type of `m`.

This patch was created using

  find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 '

and some minor manual editing

This reverts commit 20b4ae55bdf00edb751ccdab3eb876cb9b13c99f, which does
not seem to work with Coq 8.5pl2 (I accidentally tested with 8.5pl1).

This makes type checking more directed, and somewhat more predictable.

On the downside, it makes it impossible to declare the singleton on
lists as an instance of SingletonM and the insert and alter operations
on functions as instances of Alter and Insert. However, these were not
used often anyway.

There was not really a need for the lattice type classes, so I removed
these.

It is doing much more than just dealing with ∈, it solves all kinds
of goals involving set operations (including ≡ and ⊆).