Gregory Malecha authored 5 years ago and Robbert Krebbers committed 5 years ago

- remove "odd" comment
- move atomic triples to bi_scope

another variant of the linear-inv counterexample, based on an accessor that gives back the token earlier

Extend ElimModal with Boolean flags to specify whether it operates on the persistent/spatial context.

This supports Iris 2 like update modalities, as used in e.g. by @jtassaro.

This commit fixes issue #154.

This is to be used on top of stdpp's 4b5d254e.

Now that we have the plain modality, we can get rid of the basic updates
in the soundness statement.

This patch was created using

  find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 '

and some minor manual editing

    The idea on magic wand is to use it for curried lemmas and use ⊢ for uncurried lemmas.

The old choice for ★ was a arbitrary: the precedence of the ASCII asterisk *
was fixed at a wrong level in Coq, so we had to pick another symbol. The ★ was
a random choice from a unicode chart.

The new symbol ∗ (as proposed by David Swasey) corresponds better to
conventional practise and matches the symbol we use on paper.

There are now two proof mode tactics for dealing with modalities:

- `iModIntro` : introduction of a modality
- `iMod pm_trm as (x1 ... xn) "ipat"` : eliminate a modality

The behavior of these tactics can be controlled by instances of the `IntroModal`
and `ElimModal` type class. We have declared instances for later, except 0,
basic updates and fancy updates. The tactic `iMod` is flexible enough that it
can also eliminate an updates around a weakest pre, and so forth.

The corresponding introduction patterns of these tactics are `!>` and `>`.

These tactics replace the tactics `iUpdIntro`, `iUpd` and `iTimeless`.

Source of backwards incompatability: the introduction pattern `!>` is used for
introduction of arbitrary modalities. It used to introduce laters by stripping
of a later of each hypotheses.

And also rename the corresponding proof mode tactics.