Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 13e8dee5 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

Cite jungle paper.

parent a3f1b72e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type*". ...@@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type*".
(** This proves that the combination of affinity [P ∗ Q ⊢ P] and the classical (** This proves that the combination of affinity [P ∗ Q ⊢ P] and the classical
excluded-middle [P ∨ ¬P] axiom makes the separation conjunction trivial, i.e., excluded-middle [P ∨ ¬P] axiom makes the separation conjunction trivial, i.e.,
it gives [P -∗ P ∗ P]. *) it gives [P -∗ P ∗ P].
A similar proof is presented in
https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/qinxiang/files/putting_order_to_the_separation_logic_jungle_revised_version.pdf *)
Module affine_em. Section affine_em. Module affine_em. Section affine_em.
Context `{!BiAffine PROP}. Context `{!BiAffine PROP}.
Context (em : P : PROP, P ¬P). Context (em : P : PROP, P ¬P).
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment