Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Verified Commit 8d0ef7c5 authored by Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar Paolo G. Giarrusso
Browse files

Label new rule

If Ralf didn't know it, I guess it deserves a name. This is the first I got,
feel free to improve.
parent c02adf58
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ In other words, when working below the except-0 modality, we can \emph{strip ...@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ In other words, when working below the except-0 modality, we can \emph{strip
away} the later from timeless propositions. In fact, we can strip away later away} the later from timeless propositions. In fact, we can strip away later
from timeless propositions even when working under the later modality: from timeless propositions even when working under the later modality:
\begin{mathpar} \begin{mathpar}
\infer{\timeless{\prop} \and \prop \proves \later \propB} \inferH{later-timeless-strip}{\timeless{\prop} \and \prop \proves \later \propB}
{\later\prop \proves \later\propB} {\later\prop \proves \later\propB}
\end{mathpar} \end{mathpar}
This rule looks different from the above ones, because we still do not have that This rule looks different from the above ones, because we still do not have that
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment