Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Verified Commit c02adf58 authored by Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar Paolo G. Giarrusso
Browse files

Explain why the rule looks different

parent c3e98412
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ from timeless propositions even when working under the later modality: ...@@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ from timeless propositions even when working under the later modality:
\infer{\timeless{\prop} \and \prop \proves \later \propB} \infer{\timeless{\prop} \and \prop \proves \later \propB}
{\later\prop \proves \later\propB} {\later\prop \proves \later\propB}
\end{mathpar} \end{mathpar}
This rule looks different from the above ones, because we still do not have that
\begin{mathpar}
\inferH{later-fake-rule}{\timeless{\prop}}
{\later\prop \proves \prop}
\end{mathpar}
The following rules can be derived about except-0: The following rules can be derived about except-0:
\begin{mathpar} \begin{mathpar}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment