- Jun 30, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
For example iIntros "{$H1 H2} H1" frames H1, clears H2, and introduces H1.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This fixes a bug in 916ff44a causing proof mode notations not being pretty printed.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Concretely, when execution of any of the wp_ tactics does not yield another wp, it will make sure that a view shift is kept. This behavior was already partially there, but now it is hopefully more consistent.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This tweak allows us to declare pvs as an instance of FromPure (it is not an instance of IntoPure), making some tactics (like iPureIntro and done) work with pvs too.
-
- Jun 23, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This is more natural, match should be used in user code, not case.
-
- Jun 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Fun test case to play arround with abstract predicates.
-
- Jun 17, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Fixes issue #20.
-
- Jun 16, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This introduces n hypotheses and destructs the nth one.
-
- Jun 08, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 01, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
We used => before, which is strange, because it has another meaning in ssreflect.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 31, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
. This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →. -
Robbert Krebbers authored
It used to be: (P ={E}=> Q) := (True ⊢ (P → |={E}=> Q)) Now it is: (P ={E}=> Q) := (P ⊢ |={E}=> Q)
-
- May 30, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 27, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
- Make the carrier argument of the constructors for the canonical structures cofeT and cmraT explicit. This way we make sure the carrier is properly exposed, instead of some alias of the carrier. - Make derived constructions (such as discreteC and discreteR) notations instead of definitions. This is yet again to make sure that the carrier is properly exposed. - Turn DRA into a canonical structure (it used to be a type class). This fixes some issues, notably it fixes some broken rewrites in algebra/sts and it makes canonical structures work properly with dec_agree.
-
- May 24, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
To do so, we have introduced the specialization patterns: =>[H1 .. Hn] and =>[-H1 .. Hn] That generate a goal in which the view shift is preserved. These specialization patterns can also be used for e.g. iApply. Note that this machinery is not tied to primitive view shifts, and works for various kinds of goal (as captured by the ToAssert type class, which describes how to transform the asserted goal based on the main goal). TODO: change the name of these specialization patterns to reflect this generality.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Changes: - We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P -★ Q whose range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent. - While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This gets rid of the specialization pattern !. - Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following: H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn -H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P -★ Q where either P or Q is persistent. % : generate a goal for a pure premise.
-
- May 21, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- May 10, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
And make constants P for which we do not want of_val P to reduce Opaque.
-
- May 06, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 02, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
iSpecialize and iDestruct. These tactics now all take an iTrm, which is a tuple consisting of a.) a lemma or name of a hypotheses b.) arguments to instantiate c.) a specialization pattern.
-
- Apr 27, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Apr 26, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It is no longer triggered when posing [P ⊢ Q] with [P] an evar. This, for example, makes sure that iApply pvs_intro works, which failed before.
-
- Apr 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Apr 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
- It can now also frame under later. - Better treatment of evars, it now won't end up in loops whenever the goal involves sub-formulas ?P and it trying to apply all framing rules eagerly. - It no longer delta expands while framing. - Better clean up of True sub-formulas after a successful frame. For example, framing "P" in "▷ ▷ P ★ Q" yields just "Q" instead of "▷ True ★ Q" or so.
-
- Apr 19, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It is just a test case and not really part of the barrier library.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This gets rid of the (ambiguous) notation %l, because we can declare LitLoc as a coercion. It also shortens the code.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-