port to gen_proofmode

opam

@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ build: [make "-j%{jobs}%"]
 install: [make "install"]
 remove: ["rm" "-rf" "%{lib}%/coq/user-contrib/iris_examples"]
 depends: [
-  "coq-iris" { (= "dev.2018-06-23.0.a6e581d0") | (= "dev") }
+  "coq-iris" { (= "branch.gen_proofmode.2018-06-21.3.94b2c6c1") | (= "dev") }
   "coq-autosubst" { = "dev.coq86" }
 ]

theories/barrier/example_joining_existentials.v

@@ -57,10 +57,12 @@ Proof.
   iDestruct 1 as (x) "[#Hγ Hx]"; iDestruct 1 as (x') "[#Hγ' Hx']".
   iAssert (▷ (x ≡ x'))%I as "Hxx".
   { iCombine "Hγ" "Hγ'" as "Hγ2". iClear "Hγ Hγ'".
-    rewrite own_valid csum_validI /= agree_validI agree_equivI uPred.later_equivI /=.
+    rewrite own_valid csum_validI /= agree_validI agree_equivI bi.later_equivI /=.
     rewrite -{2}[x]cFunctor_id -{2}[x']cFunctor_id.
-    rewrite (ne_proper (cFunctor_map F) (cid, cid) (_ ◎ _, _ ◎ _)); last first.
-    { by split; intro; simpl; symmetry; apply iProp_fold_unfold. }
+    assert (HF : cFunctor_map F (cid, cid) ≡ cFunctor_map F (iProp_fold (Σ:=Σ) ◎ iProp_unfold, iProp_fold (Σ:=Σ) ◎ iProp_unfold)).
+    { apply ne_proper; first by apply _.
+      by split; intro; simpl; symmetry; apply iProp_fold_unfold. }
+    rewrite (HF x). rewrite (HF x').
     rewrite !cFunctor_compose. iNext. by iRewrite "Hγ2". }
   iNext. iRewrite -"Hxx" in "Hx'".
   iExists x; iFrame "Hγ". iApply (Ψ_join with "Hx Hx'").

theories/barrier/proof.v

 From iris.program_logic Require Export weakestpre.
 From iris.heap_lang Require Export lang.
 From stdpp Require Import functions.
-From iris.base_logic Require Import big_op lib.saved_prop lib.sts.
+From iris.base_logic Require Import lib.saved_prop lib.sts.
 From iris.heap_lang Require Import proofmode.
 From iris_examples.barrier Require Export barrier.
 From iris_examples.barrier Require Import protocol.
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ Proof.
     return to the client *)
     iDestruct "Hr" as (Ψ) "[HΨ Hsp]".
     iDestruct (big_opS_delete _ _ i with "Hsp") as "[#HΨi Hsp]"; first done.
-    iAssert (▷ Ψ i ∗ ▷ [∗ set] j ∈ I ∖ {[i]}, Ψ j)%I with "[HΨ]" as "[HΨ HΨ']".
+    iAssert (▷ (Ψ i ∗ [∗ set] j ∈ I ∖ {[i]}, Ψ j))%I with "[HΨ]" as "[HΨ HΨ']".
     { iNext. iApply (big_opS_delete _ _ i); first done. by iApply "HΨ". }
     iMod ("Hclose" $! (State High (I ∖ {[ i ]})) ∅ with "[HΨ' Hl Hsp]").
     { iSplit; [iPureIntro; by eauto using wait_step|].

theories/concurrent_stacks/concurrent_stack3.v

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Section stack_works.
      - The resources for the successful and failing pop must be disjoint.
        Instead, there should be a normal conjunction between them.
      Open question: How does this relate to a logically atomic spec? *)
-  Theorem stack_works ι P Q Q' Q'' Φ :
+  Theorem stack_works ι P Q Q' Q'' (Φ : val → iProp Σ) :
     ▷ (∀ (f₁ f₂ : val),
         (□((∀ v vs, P (v :: vs) ={⊤∖↑ι}=∗ Q v ∗ P vs) ∧ (* pop *)
             (P [] ={⊤∖↑ι}=∗ Q' ∗ P []) -∗

theories/concurrent_stacks/concurrent_stack4.v

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Section stack_works.
   Qed.
 
   (* Whole-stack invariant (P). *)
-  Theorem stack_works {channelG0 : channelG Σ} N P Q Q' Q'' Φ :
+  Theorem stack_works {channelG0 : channelG Σ} N P Q Q' Q'' (Φ : val → iProp Σ) :
     ▷ (∀ (f₁ f₂ : val),
         (□(((∀ v vs, P (v :: vs) ={⊤ ∖ ↑ N}=∗ Q v ∗ P vs)
             ∧ (P [] ={⊤ ∖ ↑ N}=∗ Q' ∗ P []) -∗

theories/hocap/cg_bag.v

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Section proof.
   Lemma bag_contents_agree γb X Y :
     bag_contents γb X -∗ bag_contents γb Y -∗ ⌜X = Y⌝.
   Proof.
-    rewrite /bag_contents. apply uPred.wand_intro_r.
+    rewrite /bag_contents. apply bi.wand_intro_r.
     rewrite -own_op own_valid uPred.discrete_valid.
     f_equiv=> /=. rewrite pair_op.
     by intros [_ ?%agree_op_invL'].

theories/hocap/concurrent_runners.v

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
     <http://www.kasv.dk/articles/hocap-ext.pdf>
 *)
 From iris.heap_lang Require Import proofmode notation.
+From iris.bi.lib Require Import fractional.
 From iris.algebra Require Import cmra agree frac csum excl.
 From iris.heap_lang.lib Require Import assert.
-From iris.base_logic.lib Require Import fractional.
 From iris_examples.hocap Require Export abstract_bag shared_bag lib.oneshot.
 Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 
@@ -208,11 +208,11 @@ Section contents.
       (∃ (body bag : val), ⌜r = (body, bag)%V⌝
        ∗ bagS b (N.@"bag") (λ x y, ∃ γ γ', isTask (body,x) γ γ' y P Q) γ bag
        ∗ ▷ ∀ r a: val, □ (runner γ P Q r ∗ P a -∗ WP body r a {{ v, Q a v }}))%I.
-  Proof. rewrite /runner. by rewrite {1}fixpoint_unfold. Qed.
+  Proof. rewrite /runner. by rewrite {1}(fixpoint_unfold (pre_runner _ _ _) r). Qed.
 
   Global Instance runner_persistent γ r P Q :
     Persistent (runner γ P Q r).
-  Proof. rewrite /runner fixpoint_unfold. apply _. Qed.
+  Proof. rewrite /runner (fixpoint_unfold (pre_runner _ _ _) r). apply _. Qed.
 
   Lemma newTask_spec γb (r a : val) P (Q : val → val → iProp Σ) :
     {{{ runner γb P Q r ∗ P a }}}
@@ -231,14 +231,13 @@ Section contents.
     iFrame. iSplitL; iExists _,_,_; iFrame "Hinv"; eauto.
   Qed.
 
-  Lemma task_Join_spec γb γ γ' (te : expr) (r t a : val) P Q
-    `{!IntoVal te t}:
+  Lemma task_Join_spec γb γ γ' (te : expr) (r t a : val) P Q :
+    IntoVal te t →
     {{{ runner γb P Q r ∗ task γ γ' t a P Q }}}
        task_Join te
     {{{ res, RET res; Q a res }}}.
   Proof.
-    iIntros (Φ) "[#Hrunner Htask] HΦ".
-    rewrite -(of_to_val te t into_val).
+    iIntros (<- Φ) "[#Hrunner Htask] HΦ".
     iLöb as "IH".
     rewrite {2}/task_Join.
     iDestruct "Htask" as (r' state res) "(% & Htoken & #Htask)". simplify_eq.
@@ -386,16 +385,14 @@ Section contents.
     - iNext. by iApply runner_runTasks_spec.
   Qed.
 
-  Lemma newRunner_spec P Q (fe ne : expr) (f : val) (n : nat)
-    `{!IntoVal fe f} `{!IntoVal ne (#n)}:
+  Lemma newRunner_spec P Q (fe ne : expr) (f : val) (n : nat) :
+    IntoVal fe f → IntoVal ne (#n) →
     {{{ ∀ (γ: name Σ b) (r: val),
           □ ∀ a: val, (runner γ P Q r ∗ P a -∗ WP f r a {{ v, Q a v }}) }}}
        newRunner fe ne
     {{{ γb r, RET r; runner γb P Q r }}}.
   Proof.
-    iIntros (Φ) "#Hf HΦ".
-    rewrite -(of_to_val fe f into_val).
-    rewrite -(of_to_val ne #n into_val).
+    iIntros (<- <- Φ) "#Hf HΦ".
     unfold newRunner. iApply wp_fupd.
     repeat wp_pure _.
     wp_bind (newBag b #()).
@@ -408,15 +405,13 @@ Section contents.
     iNext. iIntros (r) "Hr". by iApply "HΦ".
   Qed.
 
-  Lemma runner_Fork_spec γb (re ae:expr) (r a:val) P Q
-    `{!IntoVal re r} `{!IntoVal ae a}:
+  Lemma runner_Fork_spec γb (re ae:expr) (r a:val) P Q :
+    IntoVal re r → IntoVal ae a →
     {{{ runner γb P Q r ∗ P a }}}
        runner_Fork re ae
     {{{ γ γ' t, RET t; task γ γ' t a P Q }}}.
   Proof.
-    iIntros (Φ) "[#Hrunner HP] HΦ".
-    rewrite -(of_to_val re r into_val).
-    rewrite -(of_to_val ae a into_val).
+    iIntros (<- <- Φ) "[#Hrunner HP] HΦ".
     rewrite /runner_Fork runner_unfold.
     iDestruct "Hrunner" as (body bag) "(% & #Hbag & #Hbody)". simplify_eq.
     Local Opaque newTask.

theories/hocap/fg_bag.v

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Section proof.
   Lemma bag_contents_agree γb X Y :
     bag_contents γb X -∗ bag_contents γb Y -∗ ⌜X = Y⌝.
   Proof.
-    rewrite /bag_contents. apply uPred.wand_intro_r.
+    rewrite /bag_contents. apply bi.wand_intro_r.
     rewrite -own_op own_valid uPred.discrete_valid.
     f_equiv=> /=. rewrite pair_op.
     by intros [_ ?%agree_op_invL'].

theories/hocap/lib/oneshot.v

 From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
+From iris.bi.lib Require Import fractional.
 From iris.algebra Require Import cmra agree frac csum.
-From iris.base_logic.lib Require Import fractional.
 From iris_examples.hocap Require Export abstract_bag shared_bag.
 Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 

theories/hocap/parfib.v

@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
 From iris.heap_lang Require Import proofmode notation.
 From iris.algebra Require Import cmra agree frac csum excl.
 From iris.heap_lang.lib Require Import lock spin_lock.
-From iris.base_logic.lib Require Import fractional.
 From iris_examples.hocap Require Import abstract_bag shared_bag concurrent_runners.
 
 Section contents.

theories/hocap/shared_bag.v

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Section proof.
       iInv NI as (X) "[>Hb2 HPs]" "Hcl".
       iDestruct (bag_contents_agree with "Hb1 Hb2") as %<-.
       iMod (bag_contents_update b Y with "[$Hb1 $Hb2]") as "[Hb1 Hb2]".
-      rewrite big_sepMS_union uPred.later_sep big_sepMS_singleton.
+      rewrite big_sepMS_union bi.later_sep big_sepMS_singleton.
       iDestruct "HPs" as "[HP HPs]".
       iMod ("Hcl" with "[-HP Hb1]") as "_".
       { iNext. iExists _; iFrame. }

theories/lecture_notes/ccounter.v

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Section ccounter.
   Lemma is_ccounter_op γ₁ γ₂ ℓ q1 q2 (n1 n2 : nat) :
     is_ccounter γ₁ γ₂ ℓ (q1 + q2) (n1 + n2)%nat ⊣⊢ is_ccounter γ₁ γ₂ ℓ q1 n1 ∗ is_ccounter γ₁ γ₂ ℓ q2 n2.
   Proof.
-    apply uPred.equiv_spec; split; rewrite /is_ccounter frac_auth_frag_op own_op.
+    apply bi.equiv_spec; split; rewrite /is_ccounter frac_auth_frag_op own_op.
     - iIntros "[? #?]".
       iFrame "#"; iFrame.
     - iIntros "[[? #?] [? _]]".

theories/lecture_notes/coq_intro_example_2.v

@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ Section ccounter.
   Lemma is_ccounter_op γ ℓ q1 q2 (n1 n2 : nat) :
     is_ccounter γ ℓ (q1 + q2) (n1 + n2)%nat ⊣⊢ is_ccounter γ ℓ q1 n1 ∗ is_ccounter γ ℓ q2 n2.
   Proof.
-    apply uPred.equiv_spec; split; rewrite /is_ccounter frac_auth_frag_op own_op.
+    apply bi.equiv_spec; split; rewrite /is_ccounter frac_auth_frag_op own_op.
     - iIntros "[? #?]".
       iFrame "#"; iFrame.
     - iIntros "[[? #?] [? _]]".

theories/lecture_notes/lists.v

@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ Qed.
    The specifications are explained in the Iris Lecture Notes. *)
 
 
-Lemma foldr_spec_PI P I (f a hd : val) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val)
-  `{Hef : !IntoVal e_f f} `{Hea : !IntoVal e_a a} `{Hehd : !IntoVal e_hd hd} :
+Lemma foldr_spec_PI P I (f a hd : val) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val) :
+  IntoVal e_f f → IntoVal e_a a → IntoVal e_hd hd →
   {{{ (∀ (x a' : val) (ys : list val),
           {{{ P x ∗ I ys a'}}}
             e_f (x, a')
@@ -320,10 +320,7 @@ Lemma foldr_spec_PI P I (f a hd : val) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val)
                  ∗ I xs r
   }}}.
 Proof.
-  apply of_to_val in Hef as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hea as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hehd as <-.
-  iIntros (ϕ) "(#H_f & H_isList & H_Px & H_Iempty) H_inv".
+  iIntros (<- <- <- ϕ) "(#H_f & H_isList & H_Px & H_Iempty) H_inv".
   iInduction xs as [|x xs'] "IH" forall (ϕ a hd); wp_rec; do 2 wp_let; iSimplifyEq.
   - wp_match. iApply "H_inv". eauto.
   - iDestruct "H_isList" as (l hd') "[% [H_l H_isList]]".
@@ -338,8 +335,8 @@ Proof.
     iExists l, hd'. by iFrame.
 Qed.
 
-Lemma foldr_spec_PPI P I (f a hd : val ) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val)
-  `{Hef : !IntoVal e_f f} `{Hea : !IntoVal e_a a} `{Hehd : !IntoVal e_hd hd} :
+Lemma foldr_spec_PPI P I (f a hd : val ) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val) :
+  IntoVal e_f f → IntoVal e_a a → IntoVal e_hd hd →
   {{{ (∀ (x a' : val) (ys : list val),
           {{{ P x ∗ I ys a'}}}
             e_f (x, a')
@@ -353,10 +350,7 @@ Lemma foldr_spec_PPI P I (f a hd : val ) (e_f e_a e_hd : expr) (xs : list val)
                  ∗ I xs r
   }}}.
 Proof.
-  apply of_to_val in Hef as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hea as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hehd as <-.
-  iIntros (ϕ) "(#H_f & H_isList & H_Iempty) H_inv".
+  iIntros (<- <- <- ϕ) "(#H_f & H_isList & H_Iempty) H_inv".
   rewrite about_isList. iDestruct "H_isList" as "(H_isList & H_Pxs)".
   iApply (foldr_spec_PI with "[-H_inv]").
   - iFrame. by iFrame "H_f".
@@ -426,8 +420,8 @@ Proof.
 Qed.
 
 
-Lemma map_spec P Q (e_f e_hd : expr) (f hd : val) (xs : list val)
-  `{Hef : !IntoVal e_f f} `{Hehd : !IntoVal e_hd hd} :
+Lemma map_spec P Q (e_f e_hd : expr) (f hd : val) (xs : list val) :
+  IntoVal e_f f → IntoVal e_hd hd →
   {{{
        is_list hd xs
         ∗ (∀ (x : val), {{{ P x }}}
@@ -442,9 +436,7 @@ Lemma map_spec P Q (e_f e_hd : expr) (f hd : val) (xs : list val)
                                      ∗ ⌜List.length ys = List.length xs⌝
   }}}.
 Proof.
-  apply of_to_val in Hef as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hehd as <-.
-  iIntros (ϕ) "[H_is_list [#H1 H_P_xs]] H_ϕ".
+  iIntros (<- <- ϕ) "[H_is_list [#H1 H_P_xs]] H_ϕ".
   do 3 (wp_pure _).
   iApply (foldr_spec_PI
             P

theories/lecture_notes/modular_incr.v

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ From iris.heap_lang Require Export lang proofmode notation.
 From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
 From iris.algebra Require Import agree frac frac_auth.
 
-From iris.base_logic.lib Require Import fractional.
+From iris.bi.lib Require Import fractional.
 
 From iris.heap_lang.lib Require Import par.
 
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ Section cnt_model.
   Definition makeElem (q : Qp) (m : Z) : cntCmra := (q, to_agree m).
 
   Notation "γ ⤇[ q ] m" := (own γ (makeElem q m))
-    (at level 20, q at level 50, format "γ ⤇[ q ]  m") : uPred_scope.
+    (at level 20, q at level 50, format "γ ⤇[ q ]  m") : bi_scope.
   Notation "γ ⤇½ m" := (own γ (makeElem (1/2) m))
-    (at level 20, format "γ ⤇½  m") : uPred_scope.
+    (at level 20, format "γ ⤇½  m") : bi_scope.
 
   Global Instance makeElem_fractional γ m: Fractional (λ q, γ ⤇[q] m)%I.
   Proof.
@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ Section cnt_model.
 End cnt_model.  
 
 Notation "γ ⤇[ q ] m" := (own γ (makeElem q m))
-  (at level 20, q at level 50, format "γ ⤇[ q ]  m") : uPred_scope.
+  (at level 20, q at level 50, format "γ ⤇[ q ]  m") : bi_scope.
 Notation "γ ⤇½ m" := (own γ (makeElem (1/2) m))
-  (at level 20, format "γ ⤇½  m") : uPred_scope.
+  (at level 20, format "γ ⤇½  m") : bi_scope.
 
 Section cnt_spec.
   Context `{!heapG Σ, !cntG Σ} (N : namespace).
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ Section cnt_spec.
     {{{ Cnt ℓ γ ∗ P }}} incr #ℓ @ E {{{ (m : Z), RET #m; Cnt ℓ γ ∗ Q m}}}.
   Proof.
     iIntros (Hsubset) "#HVS".
-    iIntros (Φ) "!# [HInc HP] HCont".
+    iIntros (Φ) "!# [#HInc HP] HCont".
     iLöb as "IH".
     wp_rec.
     wp_bind (! _)%E.
@@ -178,13 +178,13 @@ Section cnt_spec.
       { iNext; iExists _; iFrame. }
       iModIntro.
       wp_if.
-      iApply "HCont"; iFrame.
+      iApply "HCont"; by iFrame.
     - wp_cas_fail.
       iMod ("HClose" with "[Hpt Hown]") as "_".
       { iNext; iExists _; iFrame. }
       iModIntro.
       wp_if.
-      iApply ("IH" with "HInc HP HCont").
+      iApply ("IH" with "HP HCont").
   Qed.
 
   Theorem wk_incr_spec (γ : gname) (E : coPset) (P Q : iProp Σ) (ℓ : loc) (n : Z) (q : Qp):
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Section cnt_spec.
     {{{ Cnt ℓ γ ∗ γ ⤇[q] n ∗ P}}} wk_incr #ℓ @ E {{{ RET #(); Cnt ℓ γ ∗ Q}}}.
   Proof.
     iIntros (Hsubset) "#HVS".
-    iIntros (Φ) "!# [HInc [Hγ HP]] HCont".
+    iIntros (Φ) "!# [#HInc [Hγ HP]] HCont".
     wp_lam.
     wp_bind (! _)%E.
     iInv (N .@ "internal") as (m) "[>Hpt >Hown]" "HClose".
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Section cnt_spec.
     iMod ("HClose" with "[Hpt Hown]") as "_".
     { iNext; iExists _; iFrame. }
     iModIntro. 
-    iApply "HCont"; iFrame.
+    iApply "HCont"; by iFrame.
   Qed.
   
   Theorem wk_incr_spec' (γ : gname) (E : coPset) (P Q : iProp Σ) (ℓ : loc) (n : Z) (q : Qp):

theories/lecture_notes/recursion_through_the_store.v

@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ Definition myrec : val :=
 (* Here is the specification for the recursion through the store function.
    See the Iris Lecture Notes for an in-depth discussion of both the specification and
    the proof. *)
-Lemma myrec_spec (P: val -> iProp Σ) (Q: val -> val -> iProp Σ) (F v1: val) (e_F e_v : expr)
-   `{HeF : !IntoVal e_F F} `{Hev1 : !IntoVal e_v v1}:
+Lemma myrec_spec (P: val -> iProp Σ) (Q: val -> val -> iProp Σ) (F v1: val) (e_F e_v : expr) :
+  IntoVal e_F F → IntoVal e_v v1 →
   {{{
        ( ∀e_f:expr,∀f : val,  ∀v2:val, ⌜IntoVal e_f f⌝ -∗ {{{(∀ v3 :val, {{{P v3 }}} e_f v3 {{{u, RET u; Q u v3 }}})
                                 ∗ P v2 }}}
@@ -62,9 +62,7 @@ Lemma myrec_spec (P: val -> iProp Σ) (Q: val -> val -> iProp Σ) (F v1: val) (e
 myrec e_F e_v
   {{{u, RET u; Q u v1}}}.
 Proof.
-  apply of_to_val in HeF as <-.
-  apply of_to_val in Hev1 as <-.
-   iIntros (ϕ) "[#H P] Q".
+   iIntros (<- <- ϕ) "[#H P] Q".
    wp_lam.
    wp_alloc r as "r".
    wp_let.
@@ -183,11 +181,10 @@ Section factorial_client.
       myfac n
       {{{v, RET v; ⌜v = #(fac_int n')⌝}}}.
   Proof.
-    iIntros (H%of_to_val Hleq Φ) "_ ret"; simplify_eq.
+    iIntros (<- Hleq Φ) "_ ret"; simplify_eq.
     iApply (myrec_spec (fun v => ⌜∃m' : Z, 0 ≤ m' ∧ to_val v = Some #m'⌝%I)
                        (fun u => fun v => ⌜∃m' : Z, to_val v = Some #m' ∧ u = #(fac_int m')⌝%I)).
-    - iSplit; last eauto. iIntros (e_f f v) "%". iAlways. iIntros (Φ') "spec_f ret".
-      apply of_to_val in a as <-.
+    - iSplit; last eauto. iIntros (e_f f v <-). iAlways. iIntros (Φ') "spec_f ret".
       wp_lam. wp_lam. iDestruct "spec_f" as "[spec_f %]".
       destruct H as [m' [Hleqm' Heq%of_to_val]]; simplify_eq.
       wp_binop.

theories/logrel/F_mu/fundamental.v

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ From iris_examples.logrel.F_mu Require Export logrel.
 From iris.program_logic Require Import lifting.
 From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
 From iris_examples.logrel.F_mu Require Import rules.
-From iris.base_logic Require Export big_op.
 
 Definition log_typed `{irisG F_mu_lang Σ} (Γ : list type) (e : expr) (τ : type) := ∀ Δ vs,
   env_Persistent Δ →
@@ -74,12 +73,12 @@ Section fundamental.
       iIntros (w) "?". by rewrite interp_subst.
     - (* Fold *)
       smart_wp_bind FoldCtx v "#Hv" IHtyped; cbn. iApply wp_value.
-      rewrite /= -interp_subst fixpoint_unfold /=.
+      rewrite /= -interp_subst fixpoint_interp_rec1_eq /=.
       iAlways; eauto.
     - (* Unfold *)
       iApply (wp_bind (fill [UnfoldCtx]));
         iApply wp_wand_l; iSplitL; [|iApply IHtyped; trivial].
-      iIntros (v) "#Hv". rewrite /= fixpoint_unfold.
+      iIntros (v) "#Hv /=". rewrite /= fixpoint_interp_rec1_eq.
       change (fixpoint _) with (⟦ TRec τ ⟧ Δ); simpl.
       iDestruct "Hv" as (w) "#[% Hw]"; subst; simpl.
       iApply wp_pure_step_later; auto. iApply wp_value; iNext.

theories/logrel/F_mu/lang.v

@@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ Export F_mu.
 
 Hint Extern 20 (PureExec _ _ _) => progress simpl : typeclass_instances.
 
-Hint Extern 5 (IntoVal _ _) => eapply to_of_val : typeclass_instances.
+Hint Extern 5 (IntoVal _ _) => eapply of_to_val; fast_done : typeclass_instances.
 Hint Extern 10 (IntoVal _ _) =>
-  rewrite /IntoVal /= ?to_of_val /=; eauto : typeclass_instances.
+  rewrite /IntoVal; eapply of_to_val; rewrite /= !to_of_val /=; solve [ eauto ] : typeclass_instances.
 
-Hint Extern 5 (AsVal _) => eexists; eapply to_of_val : typeclass_instances.
+Hint Extern 5 (AsVal _) => eexists; eapply of_to_val; fast_done : typeclass_instances.
 Hint Extern 10 (AsVal _) =>
-  eexists; rewrite /IntoVal /= ?to_of_val /=; eauto : typeclass_instances.
\ No newline at end of file
+  eexists; rewrite /IntoVal; eapply of_to_val; rewrite /= !to_of_val /=; solve [ eauto ] : typeclass_instances.

theories/logrel/F_mu/logrel.v

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
 From iris.program_logic Require Export weakestpre.
 From iris_examples.logrel.F_mu Require Export lang typing.
 From iris.algebra Require Import list.
-From iris.base_logic Require Import big_op.
 Import uPred.
 
 (** interp : is a unary logical relation. *)
@@ -15,7 +14,7 @@ Section logrel.
 
   Program Definition ctx_lookup (x : var) : listC D -n> D := λne Δ,
     from_option id (cconst True)%I (Δ !! x).
-  Solve Obligations with solve_proper_alt.
+  Solve Obligations with solve_proper.
 
   Definition interp_unit : listC D -n> D := λne Δ w, (⌜w = UnitV⌝)%I.
 
@@ -48,6 +47,10 @@ Section logrel.
     (interp : listC D -n> D) (Δ : listC D) : Contractive (interp_rec1 interp Δ).
   Proof. by solve_contractive. Qed.
 
+  Lemma fixpoint_interp_rec1_eq (interp : listC D -n> D) Δ x :
+    fixpoint (interp_rec1 interp Δ) x ≡ interp_rec1 interp Δ (fixpoint (interp_rec1 interp Δ)) x.
+  Proof. exact: (fixpoint_unfold (interp_rec1 interp Δ) x). Qed.
+
   Program Definition interp_rec (interp : listC D -n> D) : listC D -n> D := λne Δ,
     fixpoint (interp_rec1 interp Δ).
   Next Obligation.
@@ -88,7 +91,7 @@ Section logrel.
     env_Persistent Δ → Persistent (⟦ τ ⟧ Δ v) := _.
   Proof.
     revert v Δ; induction τ=> v Δ HΔ; simpl; try apply _.
-    rewrite /Persistent /interp_rec fixpoint_unfold /interp_rec1 /=.
+    rewrite /Persistent fixpoint_interp_rec1_eq /interp_rec1 /= intuitionistically_into_persistently.
     by apply persistently_intro'.
   Qed.
   Global Instance interp_env_base_persistent Δ Γ vs :
@@ -112,7 +115,9 @@ Section logrel.
       properness; auto. apply (IHτ (_ :: _)).
     - rewrite iter_up; destruct lt_dec as [Hl | Hl]; simpl.
       { by rewrite !lookup_app_l. }
-      rewrite !lookup_app_r; [|lia ..]. do 2 f_equiv. lia. 
+      (* FIXME: Ideally we wouldn't have to do this kinf of surgery. *)
+      change (bi_ofeC (uPredI (iResUR Σ))) with (uPredC (iResUR Σ)).
+      rewrite !lookup_app_r; [|lia ..]. do 2 f_equiv. lia.
     - intros w; simpl; properness; auto. apply (IHτ (_ :: _)).
   Qed.
 
@@ -129,14 +134,17 @@ Section logrel.
       properness; auto. apply (IHτ (_ :: _)).
     - rewrite iter_up; destruct lt_dec as [Hl | Hl]; simpl.
       { by rewrite !lookup_app_l. }
+      (* FIXME: Ideally we wouldn't have to do this kinf of surgery. *)
+      change (bi_ofeC (uPredI (iResUR Σ))) with (uPredC (iResUR Σ)).
       rewrite !lookup_app_r; [|lia ..].
-      destruct (x - length Δ1) as [|n] eqn:?; simpl.
+      case EQ: (x - length Δ1) => [|n]; simpl.
       { symmetry. asimpl. apply (interp_weaken [] Δ1 Δ2 τ'). }
-      rewrite !lookup_app_r; [|lia ..]. do 2 f_equiv. lia. 
+      change (bi_ofeC (uPredI (iResUR Σ))) with (uPredC (iResUR Σ)).
+      rewrite !lookup_app_r; [|lia ..]. do 2 f_equiv. lia.
     - intros w; simpl; properness; auto. apply (IHτ (_ :: _)).
   Qed.
 
-  Lemma interp_subst Δ2 τ τ' : ⟦ τ ⟧ (⟦ τ' ⟧ Δ2 :: Δ2) ≡ ⟦ τ.[τ'/] ⟧ Δ2.
+  Lemma interp_subst Δ2 τ τ' v : ⟦ τ ⟧ (⟦ τ' ⟧ Δ2 :: Δ2) v ≡ ⟦ τ.[τ'/] ⟧ Δ2 v.
   Proof. apply (interp_subst_up []). Qed.
 
   Lemma interp_env_length Δ Γ vs : ⟦ Γ ⟧* Δ vs ⊢ ⌜length Γ = length vs⌝.

theories/logrel/F_mu/rules.v

@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ Section lang_rules.
   Local Ltac solve_exec_safe := intros; subst; do 3 eexists; econstructor; eauto.
   Local Ltac solve_exec_puredet := simpl; intros; by inv_head_step.
   Local Ltac solve_pure_exec :=
-    unfold IntoVal, AsVal in *; subst;
-    repeat match goal with H : is_Some _ |- _ => destruct H as [??] end;
+    unfold IntoVal in *; subst;
+    repeat match goal with H : AsVal _ |- _ => destruct H as [??] end;
     apply det_head_step_pure_exec; [ solve_exec_safe | solve_exec_puredet ].
 
   Global Instance pure_lam e1 e2 `{!AsVal e2} :

theories/logrel/F_mu_ref/fundamental.v

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ From iris_examples.logrel.F_mu_ref Require Export logrel.
 From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics.
 From iris.program_logic Require Import lifting.
 From iris_examples.logrel.F_mu_ref Require Import rules.
-From iris.base_logic Require Export big_op.
 
 Definition log_typed `{heapG Σ} (Γ : list type) (e : expr) (τ : type) := ∀ Δ vs,
   env_Persistent Δ →
@@ -28,11 +27,11 @@ Section fundamental.
     - (* pair *)
       smart_wp_bind (PairLCtx e2.[env_subst vs]) v "#Hv" IHtyped1.
       smart_wp_bind (PairRCtx v) v' "# Hv'" IHtyped2.
-      iApply wp_value; eauto 10.
+      iApply wp_value. eauto 10.
    - (* fst *)
       smart_wp_bind (FstCtx) v "# Hv" IHtyped; cbn.
       iDestruct "Hv" as (w1 w2) "#[% [H2 H3]]"; subst.
-      iApply wp_pure_step_later; auto; by iApply wp_value.
+      iApply wp_pure_step_later; auto. by iApply wp_value.
     - (* snd *)
       smart_wp_bind (SndCtx) v "# Hv" IHtyped; cbn.
       iDestruct "Hv" as (w1 w2) "#[% [H2 H3]]"; subst.
@@ -73,12 +72,12 @@ Section fundamental.
       iIntros (w) "?". by rewrite interp_subst.
     - (* Fold *)
       smart_wp_bind FoldCtx v "#Hv" IHtyped; cbn.
-      iApply wp_value. rewrite /= -interp_subst fixpoint_unfold /=.
+      iApply wp_value. rewrite /= -interp_subst fixpoint_interp_rec1_eq /=.
       iAlways; eauto.
     - (* Unfold *)
       iApply (wp_bind (fill [UnfoldCtx]));
         iApply wp_wand_l; iSplitL; [|iApply IHtyped; auto].
-      iIntros (v) "#Hv". rewrite /= fixpoint_unfold.