Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
E
examples
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
examples
Commits
14f857ba
Commit
14f857ba
authored
8 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
add comment on dec_agree in evmap
parent
a50a88fc
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
theories/evmap.v
+5
-0
5 additions, 0 deletions
theories/evmap.v
with
5 additions
and
0 deletions
theories/evmap.v
+
5
−
0
View file @
14f857ba
...
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ From iris.algebra Require deprecated.
...
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ From iris.algebra Require deprecated.
From
iris
.
proofmode
Require
Import
tactics
.
From
iris
.
proofmode
Require
Import
tactics
.
Export
deprecated
.
dec_agree
.
Export
deprecated
.
dec_agree
.
(* Porting this to algebra.agree does not really work well because the
map from K to (Q * agree A) is part of the interface of this file.
This file should either be ditched or raised to a higher level
of abstraction, i.e., work on a map from K to A and use fmap
for the thing that's owned. *)
Section
evmap
.
Section
evmap
.
Context
(
K
A
:
Type
)
(
Q
:
cmraT
)
`{
Countable
K
,
EqDecision
A
}
.
Context
(
K
A
:
Type
)
(
Q
:
cmraT
)
`{
Countable
K
,
EqDecision
A
}
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment