Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 18, 2020
  2. Feb 10, 2020
  3. Feb 01, 2020
  4. Jan 15, 2020
  5. Dec 13, 2019
  6. Nov 22, 2019
    • Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar
      Fix iPoseProof on recursive lemmas (fix #274) · 3f468582
      Paolo G. Giarrusso authored and Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers committed
      When proving `foo` through a fixpoint, Coq's guardedness checker needs to see to
      which arguments `foo` is applied. Opaque lemmas applied to `foo` itself prevent
      that, so make them transparent.
      * Make `IntoEmpValid` lemmas transparent.
      * Expose application of `IntoEmpValid` instance to its argument.
      * Add comment to `tac_pose_proof`
      
      This MR brings back the type of `tac_pose_proof` to the one it had before !329.
      Hence, this seems worth a comment.
      3f468582
  7. Nov 08, 2019
  8. Sep 20, 2019
  9. Sep 19, 2019
  10. Aug 13, 2019
  11. Jun 15, 2019
  12. Jun 09, 2019
  13. May 24, 2019
  14. May 06, 2019
  15. May 01, 2019
  16. Mar 05, 2019
  17. Mar 03, 2019
  18. Feb 20, 2019
  19. Feb 05, 2019
  20. Jan 13, 2019
  21. Jan 11, 2019
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Allow `iSpecialize` to be nested. · c6af67f9
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      It now supports the specialization pattern `(H spat1 .. spatn)`, which first
      recursively specializes the hypothesis `H` using the specialization patterns
      `spat1 .. spatn`.
      c6af67f9
  22. Dec 13, 2018
  23. Dec 06, 2018
  24. Oct 22, 2018
  25. Oct 04, 2018
  26. Jul 31, 2018
  27. Jul 05, 2018
  28. Jul 04, 2018
Loading