Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
Actris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
tlsomers
Actris
Commits
338adc7d
Commit
338adc7d
authored
4 years ago
by
Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Functional correctness spec of double example.
parent
a50fb42a
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
theories/logrel/examples/double.v
+84
-56
84 additions, 56 deletions
theories/logrel/examples/double.v
with
84 additions
and
56 deletions
theories/logrel/examples/double.v
+
84
−
56
View file @
338adc7d
From
iris
.
algebra
Require
Import
frac
.
From
iris
.
algebra
Require
Import
frac
auth
excl
updates
.
From
iris
.
heap_lang
.
lib
Require
Export
par
spin_lock
.
From
iris
.
heap_lang
.
lib
Require
Export
par
spin_lock
.
From
actris
.
channel
Require
Import
proofmode
.
From
actris
.
channel
Require
Import
proofmode
.
From
actris
.
logrel
Require
Export
term_typing_judgment
session_types
.
From
actris
.
logrel
Require
Export
term_typing_judgment
session_types
.
...
@@ -19,69 +19,96 @@ Definition prog : val := λ: "c",
...
@@ -19,69 +19,96 @@ Definition prog : val := λ: "c",
)
.
)
.
Section
double
.
Section
double
.
Context
`{
heapG
Σ
,
chanG
Σ
,
inG
Σ
fracR
,
spawnG
Σ
}
.
Context
`{
!
heapG
Σ
,
!
chanG
Σ
,
!
spawnG
Σ
}
.
Context
`{
!
inG
Σ
(
exclR
unitO
),
inG
Σ
(
prodR
fracR
(
agreeR
(
optionO
valO
)))}
.
Definition
prog_prot
:
iProto
Σ
:=
Definition
prog_prot
(
P
:
val
→
val
→
iProp
Σ
)
:
iProto
Σ
:=
(
<
?
(
x
:
Z
)
>
MSG
#
x
;
<
?
(
y
:
Z
)
>
MSG
#
y
;
END
)
%
proto
.
(
<
?
(
v1
:
val
)
>
MSG
v1
;
<
?
(
v2
:
val
)
>
MSG
v2
{{
P
v1
v2
}}
;
END
)
%
proto
.
Definition
chan_inv
(
c
:
val
)
(
γ
:
gname
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
Definition
chan_inv
(
γ
γ1
γ2
:
gname
)
(
P
:
val
→
val
→
iProp
Σ
)
(
c
:
val
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
(
c
↣
prog_prot
∨
(
own
γ
(
Excl
())
∗
c
↣
prog_prot
P
∨
(
own
γ
(
1
/
2
)
%
Qp
∗
c
↣
<
?
(
x
:
Z
)
>
MSG
#
x
;
END
)
∨
(
∃
b
v1
,
(
own
γ
1
%
Qp
∗
c
↣
END
))
%
I
.
own
(
if
b
:
bool
then
γ1
else
γ2
)
(
3
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v1
))
%
Qp
∗
c
↣
<
?
(
v2
:
val
)
>
MSG
v2
{{
P
v1
v2
}};
END
)
∨
(
∃
v1
v2
,
own
γ1
(
1
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v1
))
%
Qp
∗
own
γ2
(
1
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v2
))
%
Qp
))
%
I
.
Lemma
wp_prog
c
:
Lemma
wp_prog
P
c
:
{{{
▷
c
↣
prog_prot
}}}
{{{
▷
c
↣
prog_prot
P
}}}
prog
c
prog
c
{{{
(
k1
k2
:
Z
)
,
RET
(
#
k
1
,
#
k
2
);
True
}}}
.
{{{
v1
v2
,
RET
(
v
1
,
v
2
);
P
v1
v2
∨
P
v2
v1
}}}
.
Proof
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(
Φ
)
"Hc HΦ"
.
iIntros
(
Φ
)
"Hc HΦ"
.
rewrite
/
prog
.
rewrite
/
prog
.
iMod
(
own_alloc
(
Excl
()))
as
(
γ
)
"Hγ"
;
[
done
|]
.
iMod
(
own_alloc
1
%
Qp
)
as
(
γ
)
"[Hcredit1 Hcredit2]"
;
[
done
|]
.
iMod
(
own_alloc
(
1
,
to_agree
None
)
%
Qp
)
as
(
γ1
)
"Hγ1"
;
[
done
|]
.
iMod
(
own_alloc
(
1
,
to_agree
None
)
%
Qp
)
as
(
γ2
)
"Hγ2"
;
[
done
|]
.
(* Create lock *)
(* Create lock *)
wp_apply
(
newlock_spec
(
chan_inv
c
γ
)
with
"[Hc]"
)
.
wp_apply
(
newlock_spec
(
chan_inv
γ
γ1
γ2
P
c
)
with
"[Hγ Hc]"
)
.
{
iLeft
.
iFrame
"Hc"
.
}
{
iLeft
.
by
iFrame
.
}
iIntros
(
lk
γlk
)
"#Hlock"
.
iIntros
(
lk
γlk
)
"#Hlock"
.
wp_pures
.
wp_pures
.
(* Fork into two threads *)
(* Fork into two threads *)
wp_apply
(
wp_par
(
λ
v
,
∃
k
:
Z
,
⌜
v
=
#
k
⌝
)
%
I
(
λ
v
,
∃
k
:
Z
,
⌜
v
=
#
k
⌝
)
%
I
wp_apply
(
wp_par
with
"[Hcredit1] [Hcredit2]"
)
.
(
λ
v1
,
own
γ1
(
1
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v1
))
%
Qp
∗
own
γ
(
Excl
())
∨
(
∃
v2
,
own
γ1
(
3
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v1
))
%
Qp
∗
own
γ2
(
1
/
2
,
to_agree
(
Some
v2
))
%
Qp
∗
P
v2
v1
))
%
I
(
λ
v2
,
own
γ2
(
1
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v2
))
%
Qp
∗
own
γ
(
Excl
())
∨
(
∃
v1
,
own
γ2
(
3
/
4
,
to_agree
(
Some
v2
))
%
Qp
∗
own
γ1
(
1
/
2
,
to_agree
(
Some
v1
))
%
Qp
∗
P
v1
v2
))
%
I
with
"[Hγ1] [Hγ2]"
)
.
-
(* Acquire lock *)
-
(* Acquire lock *)
wp_apply
(
acquire_spec
with
"Hlock"
)
.
wp_apply
(
acquire_spec
with
"Hlock"
)
.
iIntros
"[Hlocked Hc]"
.
wp_pures
.
iIntros
"[Hlocked Hc]"
.
wp_pures
.
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hc|[Hc|Hc]]"
.
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[[Hγ Hc]|[Hc|Hc]]"
.
+
wp_recv
(
x1
)
as
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
+
wp_recv
(
v
)
as
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[Hlocked Hcredit1 Hc]"
)
.
iMod
(
own_update
_
_
((
3
/
4
⋅
1
/
4
),
to_agree
(
Some
v
))
%
Qp
with
"Hγ1"
)
{
iFrame
"Hlock Hlocked"
.
iRight
.
iLeft
.
iFrame
"Hcredit1 Hc"
.
}
as
"[Hγ1a Hγ1b]"
;
[
by
apply
cmra_update_exclusive
|]
.
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[$Hlock $Hlocked Hγ1a Hc]"
)
.
eauto
.
{
iRight
.
iLeft
.
iExists
true
,
v
.
iFrame
.
}
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hcredit2 Hc]"
.
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
iLeft
.
iFrame
.
wp_recv
(
x1
)
as
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
([]
v
)
"[Hγ2 Hc]"
.
iCombine
"Hcredit1 Hcredit2"
as
"Hcredit"
.
{
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hγ1 Hγ2"
)
as
%
[]
.
}
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[Hlocked Hcredit Hc]"
)
.
wp_recv
(
v'
)
as
"HP"
.
wp_pures
.
{
iFrame
"Hlock Hlocked"
.
iRight
.
iRight
.
iFrame
"Hcredit Hc"
.
}
iMod
(
own_update
_
_
((
1
/
4
⋅
3
/
4
),
to_agree
(
Some
v'
))
%
Qp
with
"Hγ1"
)
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
as
"[Hγ1a Hγ1b]"
;
[
by
apply
cmra_update_exclusive
|]
.
eauto
.
rewrite
{
1
}(_
:
3
/
4
=
1
/
4
+
1
/
2
)
%
Qp
;
last
(
by
apply
:
bool_decide_unpack
)
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hcredit2 Hc]"
.
iDestruct
"Hγ2"
as
"[Hγ2a Hγ2b]"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hcredit1 Hcredit2"
)
as
%
[]
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[$Hlock $Hlocked Hγ1a Hγ2a Hc]"
)
.
{
do
2
iRight
.
iExists
v'
,
v
.
iFrame
.
}
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
iRight
.
iExists
v
.
iFrame
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
(
v
v'
)
"[Hγ1' _]"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hγ1 Hγ1'"
)
as
%
[]
.
-
(* Acquire lock *)
-
(* Acquire lock *)
wp_apply
(
acquire_spec
with
"Hlock"
)
.
wp_apply
(
acquire_spec
with
"Hlock"
)
.
iIntros
"[Hlocked Hc]"
.
wp_pures
.
iIntros
"[Hlocked Hc]"
.
wp_pures
.
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hc|[Hc|Hc]]"
.
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[[Hγ Hc]|[Hc|Hc]]"
.
+
wp_recv
(
x1
)
as
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
+
wp_recv
(
v
)
as
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[Hlocked Hcredit2 Hc]"
)
.
iMod
(
own_update
_
_
((
3
/
4
⋅
1
/
4
),
to_agree
(
Some
v
))
%
Qp
with
"Hγ2"
)
{
iFrame
"Hlock Hlocked"
.
iRight
.
iLeft
.
iFrame
"Hcredit2 Hc"
.
}
as
"[Hγ2a Hγ2b]"
;
[
by
apply
cmra_update_exclusive
|]
.
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[$Hlock $Hlocked Hγ2a Hc]"
)
.
eauto
.
{
iRight
.
iLeft
.
iExists
false
,
v
.
iFrame
.
}
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hcredit1 Hc]"
.
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
iLeft
.
iFrame
.
wp_recv
(
x1
)
as
"Hx1"
.
wp_pures
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
([]
v
)
"[Hγ1 Hc]"
;
last
first
.
iCombine
"Hcredit1 Hcredit2"
as
"Hcredit"
.
{
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hγ1 Hγ2"
)
as
%
[]
.
}
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[Hlocked Hcredit Hc]"
)
.
wp_recv
(
v'
)
as
"HP"
.
wp_pures
.
{
iFrame
"Hlock Hlocked"
.
iRight
.
iRight
.
iFrame
"Hcredit Hc"
.
}
iMod
(
own_update
_
_
((
1
/
4
⋅
3
/
4
),
to_agree
(
Some
v'
))
%
Qp
with
"Hγ2"
)
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
as
"[Hγ2a Hγ2b]"
;
[
by
apply
cmra_update_exclusive
|]
.
eauto
.
rewrite
{
1
}(_
:
3
/
4
=
1
/
4
+
1
/
2
)
%
Qp
;
last
(
by
apply
:
bool_decide_unpack
)
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
"[Hcredit1 Hc]"
.
iDestruct
"Hγ1"
as
"[Hγ1a Hγ1b]"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hcredit1 Hcredit2"
)
as
%
[]
.
wp_apply
(
release_spec
with
"[$Hlock $Hlocked Hγ1a Hγ2a Hc]"
)
.
-
iIntros
(??
[[
x1
->
]
[
x2
->
]])
"!>"
.
wp_pures
.
by
iApply
"HΦ"
.
{
do
2
iRight
.
iExists
v
,
v'
.
iFrame
.
}
iIntros
"_"
.
wp_pures
.
iRight
.
iExists
v
.
iFrame
.
+
iDestruct
"Hc"
as
(
v
v'
)
"(_ & Hγ2' & _)"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hγ2 Hγ2'"
)
as
%
[]
.
-
iIntros
(
v1
v2
)
"[[[H1 Hγ]|H1] [[H2 Hγ']|H2]] !>"
.
+
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hγ Hγ'"
)
as
%
[]
.
+
iDestruct
"H2"
as
(
v2'
)
"(_&H1'&HP)"
.
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"H1 H1'"
)
as
%
[_
[
=->
]
%
agree_op_invL'
]
.
iApply
"HΦ"
;
auto
.
+
iDestruct
"H1"
as
(
v1'
)
"(_&H2'&HP)"
.
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"H2 H2'"
)
as
%
[_
[
=->
]
%
agree_op_invL'
]
.
iApply
"HΦ"
;
auto
.
+
iDestruct
"H1"
as
(
v1'
)
"[H1 _]"
;
iDestruct
"H2"
as
(
v2'
)
"(_&H2&_)"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"H1 H2"
)
as
%
[]
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
prog_typed
:
Lemma
prog_typed
:
...
@@ -91,11 +118,12 @@ Section double.
...
@@ -91,11 +118,12 @@ Section double.
iApply
wp_value
.
iApply
wp_value
.
iSplitL
;
last
by
iApply
env_ltyped_empty
.
iSplitL
;
last
by
iApply
env_ltyped_empty
.
iIntros
(
c
)
"Hc"
.
iIntros
(
c
)
"Hc"
.
iApply
(
wp_prog
with
"[Hc]"
)
.
iApply
(
wp_prog
(
λ
v1
v2
,
ltty_car
lty_int
v1
∗
ltty_car
lty_int
v2
)
%
I
with
"[Hc]"
)
.
{
iApply
(
iProto_mapsto_le
_
(
lsty_car
(
<
??
>
TY
lty_int
;
<
??
>
TY
lty_int
;
END
))
with
"Hc"
)
.
{
iApply
(
iProto_mapsto_le
_
(
lsty_car
(
<
??
>
TY
lty_int
;
<
??
>
TY
lty_int
;
END
))
with
"Hc"
)
.
iIntros
"!> !>"
(
v1
)
.
iMod
1
as
%
[
x1
->
]
.
iExists
x1
.
iIntros
"!> !>"
(
v1
)
.
iMod
1
as
%
[
x1
->
]
.
iExists
#
x1
.
iIntros
"!>"
(
v2
)
.
iMod
1
as
%
[
x2
->
]
.
iExists
x2
.
auto
.
}
iIntros
"!>"
(
v2
)
.
iMod
1
as
%
[
x2
->
]
.
iExists
#
x2
.
iSplitL
;
last
done
.
iIntros
"!>"
(
k1
k2
_)
.
rewrite
/
ltty_car
/=.
auto
.
}
iExists
_,
_
.
iSplit
;
first
done
.
eauto
.
iIntros
"!>"
(
v1
v2
[[[
k1
->
]
[
k2
->
]]|[[
k1
->
]
[
k2
->
]]]);
iExists
_,
_;
iSplit
;
by
eauto
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
End
double
.
End
double
.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment