Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit f511129c authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

ProofMode.md: typos

parent 77ba610d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 2 additions and 2 deletions
ProofMode.md
+ 2
− 2
View file @ f511129c
...@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ introduction patterns: ...@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ introduction patterns:
- `# ipat` : move the hypothesis to the persistent context. - `# ipat` : move the hypothesis to the persistent context.
- `%` : move the hypothesis to the pure Coq context (anonymously). - `%` : move the hypothesis to the pure Coq context (anonymously).
- `[ipat ipat]` : (separating) conjunction elimination. - `[ipat ipat]` : (separating) conjunction elimination.
- `|ipat|ipat]` : disjunction elimination. - `[ipat|ipat]` : disjunction elimination.
- `[]` : false elimination. - `[]` : false elimination.
Apart from this, there are the following introduction patterns that can only Apart from this, there are the following introduction patterns that can only
...@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Many of the proof mode tactics (such as `iDestruct`, `iApply`, `iRewrite`) can ...@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Many of the proof mode tactics (such as `iDestruct`, `iApply`, `iRewrite`) can
take both hypotheses and lemmas, and allow one to instantiate universal take both hypotheses and lemmas, and allow one to instantiate universal
quantifiers and implications/wands of these hypotheses/lemmas on the fly. quantifiers and implications/wands of these hypotheses/lemmas on the fly.
The syntax for the arguments, called _proof mode terms_ of these tactics is: The syntax for the arguments, called _proof mode terms_, of these tactics is:
(H $! t1 ... tn with "spat1 .. spatn") (H $! t1 ... tn with "spat1 .. spatn")
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment