Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit dd01b3af authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

add some TODO so some stuff does not get forgotten

parent 3f715e68
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ Lemma to_validity_op (x y : A) : ...@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ Lemma to_validity_op (x y : A) :
to_validity (x y) to_validity x to_validity y. to_validity (x y) to_validity x to_validity y.
Proof. split; naive_solver auto using dra_op_valid. Qed. Proof. split; naive_solver auto using dra_op_valid. Qed.
(* TODO: This has to be proven again. *)
(* (*
Lemma to_validity_included x y: Lemma to_validity_included x y:
(✓ y ∧ to_validity x ≼ to_validity y)%C ↔ (✓ x ∧ x ≼ y). (✓ y ∧ to_validity x ≼ to_validity y)%C ↔ (✓ x ∧ x ≼ y).
......
...@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ Qed. ...@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ Qed.
(* This is surprisingly different from to_validity_included. I am not sure (* This is surprisingly different from to_validity_included. I am not sure
whether this is because to_validity_included is non-canonical, or this whether this is because to_validity_included is non-canonical, or this
one here is non-canonical - but I suspect both. *) one here is non-canonical - but I suspect both. *)
(* TODO: These have to be proven again. *)
(* (*
Lemma sts_frag_included S1 S2 T1 T2 : Lemma sts_frag_included S1 S2 T1 T2 :
closed S2 T2 → S2 ≢ ∅ → closed S2 T2 → S2 ≢ ∅ →
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment