Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 3ccd6f6b authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

docs: finish up accessors for now; let's just see what we write for the paper

parent c7240c72
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ For this reason, we also call such accessors \emph{non-atomic}. ...@@ -465,7 +465,6 @@ For this reason, we also call such accessors \emph{non-atomic}.
The reasons accessors are useful is that they let us talk about ``opening X'' (\eg ``opening invariants'') without having to care what X is opened around. The reasons accessors are useful is that they let us talk about ``opening X'' (\eg ``opening invariants'') without having to care what X is opened around.
Furthermore, as we construct more sophisticated and more interesting things that can be opened (\eg invariants that can be ``cancelled'', or STSs), accessors become a useful interface that allows us to mix and match different abstractions in arbitrary ways. Furthermore, as we construct more sophisticated and more interesting things that can be opened (\eg invariants that can be ``cancelled'', or STSs), accessors become a useful interface that allows us to mix and match different abstractions in arbitrary ways.
\ralf{This would be much more convincing if we had forward references here to sections describing canellable invariants and STSs.}
%%% Local Variables: %%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex %%% mode: latex
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment