Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 26, 2016
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Simplify CMRA axioms. · aa947529
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      I have simplified the following CMRA axioms:
      
        cmra_unit_preservingN n x y : x ≼{n} y → unit x ≼{n} unit y;
        cmra_op_minus n x y : x ≼{n} y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡{n}≡ y;
      
      By dropping off the step-index, so into:
      
        cmra_unit_preservingN x y : x ≼ y → unit x ≼ unit y;
        cmra_op_minus x y : x ≼ y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡ y;
      
      The old axioms can be derived.
      aa947529
  2. Feb 25, 2016
  3. Feb 24, 2016
  4. Feb 20, 2016
  5. Feb 18, 2016
  6. Feb 17, 2016
  7. Feb 13, 2016
  8. Feb 12, 2016
  9. Feb 11, 2016
  10. Feb 10, 2016
  11. Feb 09, 2016
  12. Feb 05, 2016
  13. Feb 04, 2016
  14. Feb 03, 2016
  15. Feb 02, 2016
  16. Feb 01, 2016
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Remove RA from the hierarchy. · b936a5ca
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Instead, we have just a construction to create a CMRA from a RA. This
      construction is also slightly generalized, it now works for RAs over any
      timeless COFE instead of just the discrete COFE.
      
      Also:
      * Put tactics and big_ops for CMRAs in a separate file.
      * Valid is now a derived notion (as the limit of validN), so it does not have
        to be defined by hand for each CMRA.
      
      Todo:
      Make the constructions DRA -> CMRA and RA -> CMRA more uniform.
      b936a5ca
  17. Jan 19, 2016
  18. Jan 16, 2016
  19. Jan 15, 2016
  20. Jan 14, 2016
  21. Jan 13, 2016
  22. Dec 15, 2015
Loading