Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
S
stdpp
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Simon Spies
stdpp
Commits
d67bf19d
Commit
d67bf19d
authored
Jun 05, 2015
by
Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Prove function rules.
parent
60c8d501
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Sidebyside
Showing
3 changed files
with
23 additions
and
4 deletions
+23
4
theories/collections.v
theories/collections.v
+8
0
theories/fin_maps.v
theories/fin_maps.v
+6
4
theories/list.v
theories/list.v
+9
0
No files found.
theories/collections.v
View file @
d67bf19d
...
...
@@ 178,6 +178,7 @@ Tactic Notation "decompose_elem_of" hyp(H) :=
let
H1
:
=
fresh
H
in
let
H2
:
=
fresh
H
in
apply
elem_of_guard
in
H
;
destruct
H
as
[
H1
H2
]
;
go
H2

_
∈
of_option
_
=>
apply
elem_of_of_option
in
H

_
∈
of_list
_
=>
apply
elem_of_of_list
in
H

_
=>
idtac
end
in
go
H
.
Tactic
Notation
"decompose_elem_of"
:
=
...
...
@@ 221,6 +222,8 @@ Ltac unfold_elem_of :=

context
[
_
∈
_
≫
=
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_bind
in
H

context
[
_
∈
mjoin
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_join
in
H

context
[
_
∈
guard
_;
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_guard
in
H

context
[
_
∈
of_option
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_of_option
in
H

context
[
_
∈
of_list
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_of_list
in
H
end
)
;
repeat
match
goal
with


context
[
_
⊆
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_subseteq
...
...
@@ 239,6 +242,8 @@ Ltac unfold_elem_of :=


context
[
_
∈
_
≫
=
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_bind


context
[
_
∈
mjoin
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_join


context
[
_
∈
guard
_;
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_guard


context
[
_
∈
of_option
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_of_option


context
[
_
∈
of_list
_
]
=>
setoid_rewrite
elem_of_of_list
end
.
(** The tactic [solve_elem_of tac] composes the above tactic with [intuition].
...
...
@@ 485,6 +490,9 @@ Section fresh.
rewrite
<
Forall_forall
.
intros
[
Hxs
Hxs'
].
induction
Hxs
;
decompose_Forall_hyps
;
constructor
;
auto
.
Qed
.
Lemma
Forall_fresh_subseteq
X
Y
xs
:
Forall_fresh
X
xs
→
Y
⊆
X
→
Forall_fresh
Y
xs
.
Proof
.
rewrite
!
Forall_fresh_alt
;
esolve_elem_of
.
Qed
.
Lemma
fresh_list_length
n
X
:
length
(
fresh_list
n
X
)
=
n
.
Proof
.
revert
X
.
induction
n
;
simpl
;
auto
.
Qed
.
...
...
theories/fin_maps.v
View file @
d67bf19d
...
...
@@ 240,10 +240,12 @@ Proof.
by
destruct
(
decide
(
i
=
j
))
as
[>?]
;
rewrite
?lookup_alter
,
?fmap_None
,
?lookup_alter_ne
.
Qed
.
Lemma
alter_None
{
A
}
(
f
:
A
→
A
)
m
i
:
m
!!
i
=
None
→
alter
f
i
m
=
m
.
Lemma
alter_id
{
A
}
(
f
:
A
→
A
)
m
i
:
(
∀
x
,
m
!!
i
=
Some
x
→
f
x
=
x
)
→
alter
f
i
m
=
m
.
Proof
.
intros
Hi
.
apply
map_eq
.
intros
j
.
by
destruct
(
decide
(
i
=
j
))
as
[>?]
;
rewrite
?lookup_alter
,
?Hi
,
?lookup_alter_ne
.
intros
Hi
;
apply
map_eq
;
intros
j
;
destruct
(
decide
(
i
=
j
))
as
[>?].
{
rewrite
lookup_alter
;
destruct
(
m
!!
j
)
;
f_equal'
;
auto
.
}
by
rewrite
lookup_alter_ne
by
done
.
Qed
.
(** ** Properties of the [delete] operation *)
...
...
@@ 340,7 +342,7 @@ Proof.
destruct
(
decide
(
i
=
j
))
as
[>]
;
rewrite
?lookup_insert
,
?lookup_insert_ne
;
intuition
congruence
.
Qed
.
Lemma
insert_
lookup
{
A
}
(
m
:
M
A
)
i
x
:
m
!!
i
=
Some
x
→
<[
i
:
=
x
]>
m
=
m
.
Lemma
insert_
id
{
A
}
(
m
:
M
A
)
i
x
:
m
!!
i
=
Some
x
→
<[
i
:
=
x
]>
m
=
m
.
Proof
.
intros
;
apply
map_eq
;
intros
j
;
destruct
(
decide
(
i
=
j
))
as
[>]
;
by
rewrite
?lookup_insert
,
?lookup_insert_ne
by
done
.
...
...
theories/list.v
View file @
d67bf19d
...
...
@@ 172,6 +172,15 @@ Definition zipped_map {A B} (f : list A → list A → A → B) :
list A → list A → list B := fix go l k :=
match k with [] => []  x :: k => f l k x :: go (x :: l) k end.
Definition imap2_go {A B C} (f : nat → A → B → C) :
nat → list A → list B → list C:=
fix go (n : nat) (l : list A) (k : list B) :=
match l, k with
 [], _ _, [] => []  x :: l, y :: k => f n x y :: go (S n) l k
end.
Definition imap2 {A B C} (f : nat → A → B → C) :
list A → list B → list C := imap2_go f 0.
Inductive zipped_Forall {A} (P : list A → list A → A → Prop) :
list A → list A → Prop :=
 zipped_Forall_nil l : zipped_Forall P l []
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment