Revert "Merge branch 'fix-idestruct-specialize' into 'master'"

This reverts merge request !591

iris/base_logic/lib/boxes.v

@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ Lemma slice_iff E q f P Q Q' γ b :
 Proof.
   iIntros (??) "#HQQ' #Hs Hb". destruct b.
   - iMod (slice_delete_full with "Hs Hb") as (P') "(HQ & Heq & Hb)"; try done.
-    iPoseProof ("HQQ'" with "HQ") as "HQ'".
+    iDestruct ("HQQ'" with "HQ") as "HQ'".
     iMod (slice_insert_full with "HQ' Hb") as (γ' ?) "[#Hs' Hb]"; try done.
     iExists γ', _. iIntros "{$∗ $# $%} !>". do 2 iNext. iRewrite "Heq".
     iIntros "!>". by iSplit; iIntros "[? $]"; iApply "HQQ'".

iris/proofmode/ltac_tactics.v

@@ -1992,12 +1992,6 @@ Tactic Notation "iRevertIntros" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
   iRevertIntros (x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15) "" with tac.
 
 (** * Destruct tactic *)
-
-(** [CopyDestruct] is an internal class used by the [iDestruct] tactic to
-identify universally quantified hypotheses that should be copied and not be
-consumed when they are specialized in proofmode terms.
-
-Not intended for user extensibility. *)
 Class CopyDestruct {PROP : bi} (P : PROP).
 Arguments CopyDestruct {_} _%I.
 Hint Mode CopyDestruct + ! : typeclass_instances.
@@ -2019,8 +2013,8 @@ Tactic Notation "iDestructCore" open_constr(lem) "as" constr(p) tactic3(tac) :=
     | string => constr:(Some (INamed lem))
     | iTrm =>
        lazymatch lem with
-       | @ITrm ident _ _?H _ _ => constr:(Some H)
-       | @ITrm string _ _ ?H _ _ => constr:(Some (INamed H))
+       | @iTrm ident ?H _ _ => constr:(Some H)
+       | @iTrm string ?H _ _ => constr:(Some (INamed H))
        | _ => constr:(@None ident)
        end
     | _ => constr:(@None ident)

tests/proofmode.v

@@ -93,32 +93,6 @@ Lemma test_iDestruct_intuitionistic_2 P Q `{!Persistent P, !Affine P}:
   Q ∗ (Q -∗ P) -∗ P.
 Proof. iIntros "[HQ HQP]". iDestruct ("HQP" with "HQ") as "#HP". done. Qed.
 
-Lemma test_iDestruct_specialize_wand P Q :
-  Q ∗ □(Q -∗ P) -∗ P.
-Proof.
-  iIntros "[HQ #HQP]".
-  (* iDestruct specializes, consuming the hypothesis *)
-  iDestruct ("HQP" with "HQ") as "HQP". done.
-Qed.
-
-Lemma test_iPoseProof_copy_wand P Q :
-  Q ∗ □(Q -∗ P) -∗ P ∗ (Q -∗ P).
-Proof.
-  iIntros "[HQ #HQP]".
-  (* in contrast with [iDestruct], [iPoseProof] leaves "HQP" alone *)
-  iPoseProof ("HQP" with "HQ") as "HP".
-  iFrame "HP HQP".
-Qed.
-
-Lemma test_iDestruct_pose_forall (Φ: nat → PROP) :
-  □(∀ (x:nat), Φ x) -∗ Φ 0 ∗ Φ 1.
-Proof.
-  iIntros "#H".
-  (* iDestruct does not consume "H" because it's a [∀] *)
-  iDestruct ("H" $! 0) as "$".
-  iDestruct ("H" $! 1) as "$".
-Qed.
-
 Lemma test_iDestruct_intuitionistic_affine_bi `{!BiAffine PROP} P Q `{!Persistent P}:
   Q ∗ (Q -∗ P) -∗ P ∗ Q.
 Proof. iIntros "[HQ HQP]". iDestruct ("HQP" with "HQ") as "#HP". by iFrame. Qed.