Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Pierre Roux
Iris
Commits
9a6976e2
Commit
9a6976e2
authored
4 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
prove a funny consequence of Löb induction
parent
206d8842
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
theories/bi/derived_laws_later.v
+6
-0
6 additions, 0 deletions
theories/bi/derived_laws_later.v
with
6 additions
and
0 deletions
theories/bi/derived_laws_later.v
+
6
−
0
View file @
9a6976e2
...
@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ Proof.
...
@@ -165,6 +165,12 @@ Proof.
by
rewrite
-
later_and
impl_elim_r
(
comm
_
R
)
wand_elim_r
.
by
rewrite
-
later_and
impl_elim_r
(
comm
_
R
)
wand_elim_r
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
(** A funny consequence of Löb induction.
This shows that Löb induction is incompatible with classical logic.
See [lib/counterexamples.v] for a fully worked-out proof of that fact. *)
Lemma
not_not_later_False
`{
!
BiLöb
PROP
}
:
⊢@
{
PROP
}
¬
¬
▷
False
.
Proof
.
apply
entails_impl
,
löb
.
Qed
.
(* Iterated later modality *)
(* Iterated later modality *)
Global
Instance
laterN_ne
m
:
NonExpansive
(
@
bi_laterN
PROP
m
)
.
Global
Instance
laterN_ne
m
:
NonExpansive
(
@
bi_laterN
PROP
m
)
.
Proof
.
induction
m
;
simpl
.
by
intros
???
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Proof
.
induction
m
;
simpl
.
by
intros
???
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment