Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b3e74c0d authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

Comment about traces.

parent a5ad91e5
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
theories/program_logic/adequacy.v
+ 2
− 1
View file @ b3e74c0d
...@@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ Proof. ...@@ -154,7 +154,8 @@ Proof.
Qed. Qed.
(** Since the full adequacy statement is quite a mouthful, we prove some more (** Since the full adequacy statement is quite a mouthful, we prove some more
intuitive and simpler corollaries. *) intuitive and simpler corollaries. These lemmas are morover stated in terms of
[rtc erased_step] so one does not have to provide the trace. *)
Record adequate {Λ} (s : stuckness) (e1 : expr Λ) (σ1 : state Λ) Record adequate {Λ} (s : stuckness) (e1 : expr Λ) (σ1 : state Λ)
(φ : val Λ → state Λ → Prop) := { (φ : val Λ → state Λ → Prop) := {
adequate_result t2 σ2 v2 : adequate_result t2 σ2 v2 :
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment