@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ We collect here some important and frequently used derived proof rules.
...
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ We collect here some important and frequently used derived proof rules.
{\TRUE\proves\plainly\TRUE}
{\TRUE\proves\plainly\TRUE}
\end{mathparpagebreakable}
\end{mathparpagebreakable}
Noteworthy here is the fact that Löb induction can be derived from $\later$-introduction and the fact that we can take fixed-points of functions where the recursive occurrences are below $\later$.%
Noteworthy here is the fact that Löb induction can be derived from $\later$-introduction and the fact that we can take fixed-points of functions where the recursive occurrences are below $\later$~\cite{Loeb}.%
\footnote{Also see \url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L\%C3\%B6b\%27s_theorem}.}
Furthermore, $\TRUE\proves\plainly\TRUE$ can be derived via $\plainly$ commuting with universal quantification ranging over the empty type $0$.
Furthermore, $\TRUE\proves\plainly\TRUE$ can be derived via $\plainly$ commuting with universal quantification ranging over the empty type $0$.
To derive that existential quantifiers commute with separating conjunction requires an intermediate step using a magic wand: From $P *\exists x, Q \vdash\Exists x. P * Q$ we can deduce $\Exists x. Q \vdash P \wand\Exists x. P * Q$ and then proceed via $\exists$-elimination.
To derive that existential quantifiers commute with separating conjunction requires an intermediate step using a magic wand: From $P *\exists x, Q \vdash\Exists x. P * Q$ we can deduce $\Exists x. Q \vdash P \wand\Exists x. P * Q$ and then proceed via $\exists$-elimination.