- Jun 18, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 16, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Used the following script: sed ' s/\bCofeMor/OfeMor/g; s/\-c>/\-d>/g; s/\bcFunctor/oFunctor/g; s/\bCFunctor/OFunctor/g; s/\b\%CF/\%OF/g; s/\bconstCF/constOF/g; s/\bidCF/idOF/g s/\bdiscreteC/discreteO/g; s/\bleibnizC/leibnizO/g; s/\bunitC/unitO/g; s/\bprodC/prodO/g; s/\bsumC/sumO/g; s/\bboolC/boolO/g; s/\bnatC/natO/g; s/\bpositiveC/positiveO/g; s/\bNC/NO/g; s/\bZC/ZO/g; s/\boptionC/optionO/g; s/\blaterC/laterO/g; s/\bofe\_fun/discrete\_fun/g; s/\bdiscrete\_funC/discrete\_funO/g; s/\bofe\_morC/ofe\_morO/g; s/\bsigC/sigO/g; s/\buPredC/uPredO/g; s/\bcsumC/csumO/g; s/\bagreeC/agreeO/g; s/\bauthC/authO/g; s/\bnamespace_mapC/namespace\_mapO/g; s/\bcmra\_ofeC/cmra\_ofeO/g; s/\bucmra\_ofeC/ucmra\_ofeO/g; s/\bexclC/exclO/g; s/\bgmapC/gmapO/g; s/\blistC/listO/g; s/\bvecC/vecO/g; s/\bgsetC/gsetO/g; s/\bgset\_disjC/gset\_disjO/g; s/\bcoPsetC/coPsetO/g; s/\bgmultisetC/gmultisetO/g; s/\bufracC/ufracO/g s/\bfracC/fracO/g; s/\bvalidityC/validityO/g; s/\bbi\_ofeC/bi\_ofeO/g; s/\bsbi\_ofeC/sbi\_ofeO/g; s/\bmonPredC/monPredO/g; s/\bstateC/stateO/g; s/\bvalC/valO/g; s/\bexprC/exprO/g; s/\blocC/locO/g; ' -i $(find theories -name "*.v")
-
- Jun 12, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 11, 2019
- Jun 10, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 03, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This allows one to make use of recursive ghost state obtained from the recursive domain equation solver.
-
- Jun 02, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jun 01, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- May 31, 2019
-
-
Amin Timany authored
-
- May 28, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 25, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
With Coq master, we otherwise fail to infer instances with subG_savedAnythingΣ, which leads to goals like > looking for (subG > (@savedAnythingΣ (@ofe_funCF val (fun _ : val => laterCF idCF)) > ?cFunctorContractive0) Σ)
-
- May 24, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This MR is a follow up on the renamings performed (implicitly) as part of !215. This MR makes the following changes: - `auth_both_frac_valid` and `auth_both_valid` are now of the same shape as `auth_both_frac_validN` and `auth_both_validN`. That is, both are now biimplications. - The left-to-right direction of `auth_both_frac_valid` and `auth_both_valid` only holds in case the camera is discrete. The right-to-left versions for non-discrete cameras are prefixed `_2`, the convention that we use throughout the development. - Change the direction of lemmas like `auth_frag_valid` and `auth_auth_valid` so that it's consistent with the other lemmas. I.e. make sure that the ◯ and ● are always on the LHS of the biimplication.
-
- May 23, 2019
-
-
- May 20, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- May 16, 2019
-
-
Paolo G. Giarrusso authored
-
- May 01, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Notably, `big_andL_andL` and `big_andL_and` where a ⊣⊢ and ⊢ version of the same lemma. I favored the `big_opL_op` naming scheme.
-
- Mar 29, 2019
- Mar 22, 2019
-
-
Rodolphe Lepigre authored
-
- Mar 19, 2019
-
-
Rodolphe Lepigre authored
-
- Mar 13, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Mar 06, 2019
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- Mar 05, 2019
- Mar 03, 2019
- Feb 20, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jan 24, 2019
-
-
Maxime Dénès authored
This is in preparation for coq/coq#9274.
-
- Jan 11, 2019
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Dec 10, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This lemma is similar to `later_ownM`.
-
- Dec 07, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 31, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Oct 24, 2018
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-