Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit bdb566a4 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

Shorten proof.

parent e4091905
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
theories/bi/derived_laws_bi.v
+ 1
− 5
View file @ bdb566a4
......@@ -123,11 +123,7 @@ Proof.
+ rewrite -EQ impl_elim_r. done.
Qed.
Lemma entails_impl_True P Q : (P ⊢ Q) ↔ (True ⊢ (P → Q)).
Proof.
rewrite entails_eq_True. split.
- by intros <-.
- intros. apply (anti_symm (⊢)); last done. apply True_intro.
Qed.
Proof. rewrite entails_eq_True equiv_spec; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma and_mono P P' Q Q' : (P ⊢ Q) → (P' ⊢ Q') → P ∧ P' ⊢ Q ∧ Q'.
Proof. auto. Qed.
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment