Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • I Iris
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Artifacts
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Model experiments
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Rodolphe Lepigre
  • Iris
  • Repository
  • iris
  • program_logic
  • invariants.v
Find file Blame History Permalink
  • Ralf Jung's avatar
    Prove another lemma to open invariants that we only know by namespace. · da024695
    Ralf Jung authored May 25, 2016
    The good news is, this one works without FSAs, and it can be applied around the "view shift with a step"-thing.
    Furthermore, the FSA lemma can be derived from the new one.
    The bad news is, the FSA lemma proof doesn't even get shorter in doing this change.
    da024695