Skip to content
  • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
    Attempt at an iInduction tactic. · 9eb50174
    Robbert Krebbers authored
    This comment mostly addresses issue #34.
    There are still some issues:
    - For iLöb we can write `iLöb (x1 .. xn) as "IH"` to revert x1 .. xn
      before performing Löb induction. An analogue notation for iInduction
      results in parsing conflicts.
    - The names of the induction hypotheses in the Coq intro pattern are
      ignored. Instead, when using `iInduction x as pat "IH"` the induction
      hypotheses are given fresh names starting with "IH". The problem here
      is that the names in the introduction pattern are idents, whereas the
      induction hypotheses are inserted into the proof mode context, and thus
      need to have strings as names.