be the same as .

This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more
consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note
that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.

Now, for example, when having equiv (Some x) (Some y) it will
try to find a Proper whose range is an equiv before hitting the
eq instance. My hack is general enough that it works for Forall2,
dist, and so on, too.

It used to be: (P ={E}=> Q) := (True ⊢ (P → |={E}=> Q))
Now it is: (P ={E}=> Q) := (P ⊢ |={E}=> Q)

Based on an idea and WIP commits of J-H. Jourdan: the core of a CMRA
A is now a partial function A → option A.

TODO: define sum CMRA
TODO: remove one shot CMRA and define it in terms of sum

We git this from monotonicity now.

The good news is, this one works without FSAs, and it can be applied around the "view shift with a step"-thing.
Furthermore, the FSA lemma can be derived from the new one.
The bad news is, the FSA lemma proof doesn't even get shorter in doing this change.

- Make the carrier argument of the constructors for the canonical structures
  cofeT and cmraT explicit. This way we make sure the carrier is properly
  exposed, instead of some alias of the carrier.
- Make derived constructions (such as discreteC and discreteR) notations
  instead of definitions. This is yet again to make sure that the carrier is
  properly exposed.
- Turn DRA into a canonical structure (it used to be a type class).

This fixes some issues, notably it fixes some broken rewrites in algebra/sts
and it makes canonical structures work properly with dec_agree.

Changes:
- We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P -★ Q whose
  range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system
  automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent.
- While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This
  gets rid of the specialization pattern !.
- Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for
  generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following:

    H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn
   -H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn
           # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be
               used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P -★ Q where
               either P or Q is persistent.
           % : generate a goal for a pure premise.

iSpecialize and iDestruct.

These tactics now all take an iTrm, which is a tuple consisting of
a.) a lemma or name of a hypotheses b.) arguments to instantiate
c.) a specialization pattern.

These tactics are superfluous:
- iPure H as pat => iDestruct H as pat
- iPersistent H => iSpecialize H "!"