Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
stdpp
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
stdpp
Commits
e3415663
Commit
e3415663
authored
3 years ago
by
Glen Mével
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
add some lemmas about `Finite` and `pred_finite`
parent
cf7c2c41
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!351
add some lemmas about `Finite` and `pred_finite`
Changes
4
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
4 changed files
CHANGELOG.md
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
CHANGELOG.md
theories/fin_sets.v
+8
-0
8 additions, 0 deletions
theories/fin_sets.v
theories/finite.v
+28
-0
28 additions, 0 deletions
theories/finite.v
theories/sets.v
+40
-0
40 additions, 0 deletions
theories/sets.v
with
77 additions
and
0 deletions
CHANGELOG.md
+
1
−
0
View file @
e3415663
...
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Coq 8.10 is no longer supported by this release.
...
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Coq 8.10 is no longer supported by this release.
-
Rename
`decide_iff`
→
`decide_ext`
and
`bool_decide_iff`
→
`bool_decide_ext`
.
-
Rename
`decide_iff`
→
`decide_ext`
and
`bool_decide_iff`
→
`bool_decide_ext`
.
-
Remove a spurious
`Global Arguments Pos.of_nat : simpl never`
.
-
Remove a spurious
`Global Arguments Pos.of_nat : simpl never`
.
-
Add tactics
`destruct select <pat>`
and
`destruct select <pat> as <intro_pat>`
.
-
Add tactics
`destruct select <pat>`
and
`destruct select <pat> as <intro_pat>`
.
-
Add some more lemmas about
`Finite`
and
`pred_finite`
.
The following
`sed`
script should perform most of the renaming
The following
`sed`
script should perform most of the renaming
(on macOS, replace
`sed`
by
`gsed`
, installed via e.g.
`brew install gnu-sed`
).
(on macOS, replace
`sed`
by
`gsed`
, installed via e.g.
`brew install gnu-sed`
).
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
theories/fin_sets.v
+
8
−
0
View file @
e3415663
...
@@ -475,6 +475,14 @@ Proof.
...
@@ -475,6 +475,14 @@ Proof.
-
intros
[
X
Hfin
]
.
exists
(
elements
X
)
.
set_solver
.
-
intros
[
X
Hfin
]
.
exists
(
elements
X
)
.
set_solver
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
dec_pred_finite_set
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
{
Hdec
:
∀
x
:
A
,
Decision
(
P
x
)}
:
pred_finite
P
↔
(
∃
X
:
C
,
∀
x
,
P
x
↔
x
∈
X
)
.
Proof
.
rewrite
dec_pred_finite
;
[|
done
]
.
split
.
-
intros
[
xs
Hfin
]
.
exists
(
list_to_set
xs
)
.
set_solver
.
-
intros
[
X
Hfin
]
.
exists
(
elements
X
)
.
set_solver
.
Qed
.
Lemma
pred_infinite_set
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
:
Lemma
pred_infinite_set
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
:
pred_infinite
P
↔
(
∀
X
:
C
,
∃
x
,
P
x
∧
x
∉
X
)
.
pred_infinite
P
↔
(
∀
X
:
C
,
∃
x
,
P
x
∧
x
∉
X
)
.
Proof
.
Proof
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
theories/finite.v
+
28
−
0
View file @
e3415663
...
@@ -373,6 +373,34 @@ Qed.
...
@@ -373,6 +373,34 @@ Qed.
Lemma
fin_card
n
:
card
(
fin
n
)
=
n
.
Lemma
fin_card
n
:
card
(
fin
n
)
=
n
.
Proof
.
unfold
card
;
simpl
.
induction
n
;
simpl
;
rewrite
?fmap_length
;
auto
.
Qed
.
Proof
.
unfold
card
;
simpl
.
induction
n
;
simpl
;
rewrite
?fmap_length
;
auto
.
Qed
.
Lemma
finite_dec
(
P
:
Prop
)
`{
Hfin
:
Finite
P
}
:
Decision
P
.
Proof
.
destruct
Hfin
as
[[
|
p
proofs'
]
_
Hproofs
]
.
{
right
.
intros
p
.
specialize
(
Hproofs
p
)
as
?
%
not_elem_of_nil
.
naive_solver
.
}
{
left
.
done
.
}
Qed
.
(* shouldn’t be an instance (cycle with [sig_finite]): *)
Lemma
finite_sig_dec
{
A
}
{
Heqdec
:
EqDecision
A
}
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
`{
Hfin
:
Finite
(
sig
P
)}
:
∀
x
,
Decision
(
P
x
)
.
Proof
.
intros
x
.
destruct
Hfin
as
[
elems
_
Helems'
]
.
assert
(
∀
px
,
(
x
↾
px
)
∈
elems
)
as
Helems
by
done
;
clear
Helems'
.
assert
(
Decision
{
px
|
(
x
↾
px
)
∈
elems
})
as
[[
px
?]
|
no_px
]
.
{
induction
elems
as
[
|
[
y
py
]
elems'
IH
]
.
{
right
.
intros
[?
?
%
not_elem_of_nil
]
.
naive_solver
.
}
{
destruct
(
decide
(
x
=
y
))
as
[
->
|
?]
.
{
left
.
by
exists
py
.
}
{
destruct
IH
as
[[
px
?]
|
no_px
]
.
{
intros
px
.
specialize
(
Helems
px
)
as
?
%
elem_of_cons
.
naive_solver
.
}
{
left
.
by
exists
px
.
}
{
right
.
intros
[
px
?
%
elem_of_cons
]
.
naive_solver
.
}
}
}
}
{
by
left
.
}
{
right
.
intros
px
.
apply
no_px
.
by
exists
px
.
}
Qed
.
Section
sig_finite
.
Section
sig_finite
.
Context
{
A
}
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
`{
∀
x
,
Decision
(
P
x
)}
.
Context
{
A
}
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
`{
∀
x
,
Decision
(
P
x
)}
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
theories/sets.v
+
40
−
0
View file @
e3415663
...
@@ -1169,6 +1169,46 @@ Proof.
...
@@ -1169,6 +1169,46 @@ Proof.
intros
xs
.
exists
(
fresh
xs
)
.
split
;
[
set_solver
|]
.
apply
infinite_is_fresh
.
intros
xs
.
exists
(
fresh
xs
)
.
split
;
[
set_solver
|]
.
apply
infinite_is_fresh
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
dec_pred_finite
{
A
}
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
{
Hdec
:
∀
x
,
Decision
(
P
x
)}
:
pred_finite
P
↔
∃
(
xs
:
list
A
),
∀
x
,
P
x
↔
x
∈
xs
.
Proof
.
split
;
intros
[
xs
Hxs
];
[|
exists
xs
;
set_solver
]
.
cut
(
∀
n
,
∃
ys
,
(
∀
x
,
P
x
→
x
∈
ys
++
drop
n
xs
)
∧
(
∀
x
,
x
∈
ys
→
P
x
))
.
{
intros
H
.
specialize
(
H
(
length
xs
))
as
(
ys
&
H1
&
H2
)
.
rewrite
drop_all
,
app_nil_r
in
H1
.
exists
ys
.
set_solver
.
}
intros
n
.
induction
n
as
[
|
n
(
ys
&
IH1
&
IH2
)]
.
{
exists
[]
.
rewrite
drop_0
.
set_solver
.
}
destruct
(
decide
(
n
<
length
xs
))
as
[[
y
Hn
]
%
lookup_lt_is_Some
|
?]
.
{
destruct
(
decide
(
P
y
))
as
[
Hy
|
Hy
]
.
{
exists
(
ys
++
[
y
])
.
pose
proof
(
assoc
app
)
as
<-.
cbn
.
rewrite
<-
drop_S
;
set_solver
.
}
{
exists
ys
.
split
;
[|
done
]
.
intros
x
Hx
.
specialize
(
IH1
x
Hx
)
as
[?
|
Hx_elem_of
]
%
elem_of_app
;
[
set_solver
|]
.
erewrite
drop_S
in
Hx_elem_of
;
set_solver
.
}
}
{
exists
ys
.
revert
IH1
.
rewrite
!
drop_ge
,
app_nil_r
;
[
done
|
lia
..]
.
}
Qed
.
Lemma
finite_sig_pred_finite
{
A
}
(
P
:
A
→
Prop
)
`{
Hfin
:
Finite
(
sig
P
)}
:
pred_finite
P
.
Proof
.
exists
(
proj1_sig
<$>
enum
_)
.
intros
x
px
.
apply
elem_of_list_fmap_1_alt
with
(
x
↾
px
);
[
apply
elem_of_enum
|];
done
.
Qed
.
Lemma
pred_finite_arg2
{
A
B
}
(
P
:
A
→
B
→
Prop
)
:
pred_finite
(
uncurry
P
)
→
∀
x
,
pred_finite
(
P
x
)
.
Proof
.
intros
[
xys
?]
x
.
exists
(
xys
.
*
2
)
.
intros
y
?
.
apply
elem_of_list_fmap_1_alt
with
(
x
,
y
);
by
auto
.
Qed
.
Lemma
pred_finite_arg1
{
A
B
}
(
P
:
A
→
B
→
Prop
)
:
pred_finite
(
uncurry
P
)
→
∀
y
,
pred_finite
(
flip
P
y
)
.
Proof
.
intros
[
xys
?]
y
.
exists
(
xys
.
*
1
)
.
intros
x
?
.
apply
elem_of_list_fmap_1_alt
with
(
x
,
y
);
by
auto
.
Qed
.
(** Sets of sequences of natural numbers *)
(** Sets of sequences of natural numbers *)
(* The set [seq_seq start len] of natural numbers contains the sequence
(* The set [seq_seq start len] of natural numbers contains the sequence
[start, start + 1, ..., start + (len-1)]. *)
[start, start + 1, ..., start + (len-1)]. *)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment