Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
stdpp
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
stdpp
Commits
8ed74c3a
Commit
8ed74c3a
authored
7 years ago
by
Hai Dang
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
simplify proofs of gmap filter
parent
bc61b7a5
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
1 merge request
!6
Add filter for gmap
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
theories/gmap.v
+23
-44
23 additions, 44 deletions
theories/gmap.v
with
23 additions
and
44 deletions
theories/gmap.v
+
23
−
44
View file @
8ed74c3a
...
@@ -254,15 +254,8 @@ Section filter.
...
@@ -254,15 +254,8 @@ Section filter.
∀
m
k
,
∀
m
k
,
filter
P
m
!!
k
=
None
↔
m
!!
k
=
None
∨
∀
v
,
m
!!
k
=
Some
v
→
¬
P
(
k
,
v
)
.
filter
P
m
!!
k
=
None
↔
m
!!
k
=
None
∨
∀
v
,
m
!!
k
=
Some
v
→
¬
P
(
k
,
v
)
.
Proof
.
Proof
.
apply
(
map_fold_ind
(
λ
m1
m2
,
∀
k
,
m1
!!
k
=
None
intros
m
k
.
rewrite
eq_None_not_Some
.
unfold
is_Some
.
↔
(
m2
!!
k
=
None
∨
∀
v
,
m2
!!
k
=
Some
v
→
¬
P
_)))
.
setoid_rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
naive_solver
.
-
naive_solver
.
-
intros
k
v
m
m'
Hm
Eq
k'
.
case_match
;
case
(
decide
(
k'
=
k
))
as
[
->
|?]
.
+
rewrite
2
!
lookup_insert
.
naive_solver
.
+
do
2
(
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
])
.
by
apply
Eq
.
+
rewrite
Eq
,
Hm
,
lookup_insert
.
naive_solver
.
+
by
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_dom
m
:
Lemma
gmap_filter_dom
m
:
...
@@ -272,51 +265,37 @@ Section filter.
...
@@ -272,51 +265,37 @@ Section filter.
destruct
1
as
[?[
Eq
_]
%
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
]
.
by
eexists
.
destruct
1
as
[?[
Eq
_]
%
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
]
.
by
eexists
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_equiv
`{
Equiv
A
}
`{
Reflexive
A
(
≡
)}
m1
m2
:
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_equiv
m1
m2
:
(
∀
k
v
,
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
m1
!!
k
=
Some
v
↔
m2
!!
k
=
Some
v
)
(
∀
k
v
,
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
m1
!!
k
=
Some
v
↔
m2
!!
k
=
Some
v
)
→
filter
P
m1
≡
filter
P
m2
.
→
filter
P
m1
=
filter
P
m2
.
Proof
.
Proof
.
intros
HP
k
.
intros
HP
.
apply
map_eq
.
intros
k
.
destruct
(
filter
P
m1
!!
k
)
as
[
v1
|]
eqn
:
Hv1
;
destruct
(
filter
P
m2
!!
k
)
as
[
v2
|]
eqn
:
Hv2
;
[
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv1
as
[
Hv1
HP1
];
[
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
HP2
];
specialize
(
HP
k
v1
HP1
)|];
specialize
(
HP
k
v2
HP2
)
destruct
(
filter
P
m2
!!
k
)
as
[
v2
|]
eqn
:
Hv2
.
|
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
;
right
;
intros
v
EqS
ISP
;
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
_]
.
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
|
Hv2
]]
.
rewrite
Hv1
,
Hv2
in
HP
.
destruct
HP
as
[
HP
_]
.
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
by
rewrite
HP
.
specialize
(
HP
(
eq_refl
_))
as
[]
.
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
-
specialize
(
HP
_
_
ISP
)
.
rewrite
HP
,
Hv2
in
EqS
.
naive_solver
.
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
|
Hv2
];
-
apply
(
Hv2
v
);
[
by
apply
HP
|
done
]
.
[
naive_solver
|
by
apply
HP
,
Hv2
in
Hv1
]
.
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
HP2
]
.
specialize
(
HP
k
v2
HP2
)
.
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv1
as
[
Hv1
|
Hv1
]
.
+
rewrite
Hv1
in
HP
.
naive_solver
.
+
by
apply
HP
,
Hv1
in
Hv2
.
-
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_insert
`{
Equiv
A
}
`{
Reflexive
A
(
≡
)}
m
k
v
:
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_insert
m
k
v
:
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
(
filter
P
m
)
≡
filter
P
(
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
m
)
.
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
(
filter
P
m
)
=
filter
P
(
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
m
)
.
Proof
.
Proof
.
intros
HP
k'
.
intros
HP
.
apply
map_eq
.
intros
k'
.
case
(
decide
(
k'
=
k
))
as
[
->
|?];
case
(
decide
(
k'
=
k
))
as
[
->
|?];
[
rewrite
lookup_insert
|
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
]]
.
[
rewrite
lookup_insert
|
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
]]
.
-
destruct
(
filter
P
(
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
m
)
!!
k
)
eqn
:
Hk
.
-
symmetry
.
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
by
rewrite
lookup_insert
.
+
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hk
.
rewrite
lookup_insert
in
Hk
.
destruct
Hk
as
[
Hk
_]
.
inversion
Hk
.
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
+
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hk
.
rewrite
lookup_insert
in
Hk
.
destruct
Hk
as
[
->
|
HNP
]
.
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
by
specialize
(
HNP
v
(
eq_refl
_))
.
-
destruct
(
filter
P
(
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
m
)
!!
k'
)
eqn
:
Hk
;
revert
Hk
;
-
destruct
(
filter
P
(
<
[
k
:=
v
]
>
m
)
!!
k'
)
eqn
:
Hk
;
revert
Hk
;
[
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
|
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_None
];
[
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
,
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
by
auto
];
(
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
by
auto
]);
by
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
[
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_
Some
|
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_None
];
|
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_
None
,
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
];
intros
Hk
;
rewrite
Hk
;
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
by
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_None
]
.
Qed
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_empty
`{
Equiv
A
}
:
filter
P
(
∅
:
gmap
K
A
)
≡
∅.
Lemma
gmap_filter_empty
`{
Equiv
A
}
:
filter
P
(
∅
:
gmap
K
A
)
=
∅.
Proof
.
intro
l
.
rewrite
lookup_empty
.
constructor
.
Qed
.
Proof
.
apply
map_fold_empty
.
Qed
.
End
filter
.
End
filter
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment