Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
stdpp
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
stdpp
Commits
054ac622
Verified
Commit
054ac622
authored
9 months ago
by
Sanjit Bhat
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
docs(gmap): add galina escaping
parent
9e2c5234
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!557
docs(gmap): add galina escaping
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
stdpp/gmap.v
+2
-3
2 additions, 3 deletions
stdpp/gmap.v
with
2 additions
and
3 deletions
stdpp/gmap.v
+
2
−
3
View file @
054ac622
...
@@ -15,9 +15,8 @@ has the same good properties:
...
@@ -15,9 +15,8 @@ has the same good properties:
Compared to [Pmap], we not only need to make sure the trie representation is
Compared to [Pmap], we not only need to make sure the trie representation is
canonical, we also need to make sure that all positions (of type positive) are
canonical, we also need to make sure that all positions (of type positive) are
valid encodings of [K]. That is, for each position [q] in the trie, we have:
valid encodings of [K]. That is, for each position [q] in the trie, we have
[encode <$> decode q = Some q].
encode <$> decode q = Some q
Instead of formalizing this condition using a Sigma type (which would break
Instead of formalizing this condition using a Sigma type (which would break
the strict positivity check in nested recursive definitions), we make
the strict positivity check in nested recursive definitions), we make
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment