Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 03b166ab authored by Armaël Guéneau's avatar Armaël Guéneau
Browse files

Slight update to the documentation of [split_and{!,?}]

parent 7d705c84
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!117Add destruct_or tactics to (possibly repeatedly) split disjunctions in an assumption
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 2 additions and 2 deletions
theories/tactics.v
+ 2
− 2
View file @ 03b166ab
...@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ Tactic Notation "etrans" := etransitivity. ...@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ Tactic Notation "etrans" := etransitivity.
(** Tactics for splitting conjunctions: (** Tactics for splitting conjunctions:
- [split_and] : split the goal if is syntactically of the shape [_ ∧ _] - [split_and] : split the goal if is syntactically of the shape [_ ∧ _]
- [split_ands?] : split the goal repeatedly (perhaps zero times) while it is - [split_and?] : split the goal repeatedly (perhaps zero times) while it is
of the shape [_ ∧ _]. of the shape [_ ∧ _].
- [split_ands!] : works similarly, but at least one split should succeed. In - [split_and!] : works similarly, but at least one split should succeed. In
order to do so, it will head normalize the goal first to possibly expose a order to do so, it will head normalize the goal first to possibly expose a
conjunction. conjunction.
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment