Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • Iris Iris
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 148
    • Issues 148
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 7
    • Merge requests 7
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Iris
  • IrisIris
  • Issues
  • #250
Closed
Open
Created Jun 24, 2019 by Paolo G. Giarrusso@BlaisorbladeContributor

equivI lemma for sigT

To use the new sigT construction, it helps to have an equivI lemma such as:

  Lemma sigT_equivI {A : Type} {P : A → ofeT} (x y : sigT P) :
    x ≡ y ⊣⊢
    ∃ eq : projT1 x = projT1 y, rew eq in projT2 x ≡ projT2 y : iProp Σ.
  Proof. by unseal. Qed.

@robbertkrebbers asks: should we have this just for iProp, or for any sbi?

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking