Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ee3c6ec1 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

More README tweaking.

parent f803fca1
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #21579 passed
......@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ correspond to the following parts of the paper:
## Notation
The notation for Dependent Separation Protocols differ between the paper and
the Coq mechanization:
The following table gives a mapping between the notation in the paper and the
Coq mechanization:
| | Paper | Coq mechanization |
|--------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
......@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ of Actris and the formalization in Coq, that are briefly discussed here.
later modalities expose that these operations perform at least three steps in
the operational semantics, and are needed to deal with the three levels of
indirection in the invariant for protocols:
1. the `▶` in the CPS encoding of protocols,
1. the `▶` in the model of protocols,
2. the higher-order ghost state used for ownership of protocols, and
3. the opening of the protocol invariant.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment