Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
Actris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
Actris
Commits
ee3c6ec1
Commit
ee3c6ec1
authored
5 years ago
by
Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
More README tweaking.
parent
f803fca1
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#21579
passed
5 years ago
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
README.md
+3
-3
3 additions, 3 deletions
README.md
with
3 additions
and
3 deletions
README.md
+
3
−
3
View file @
ee3c6ec1
...
...
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ correspond to the following parts of the paper:
## Notation
The
notation for Dependent Separation Protocols differ betwee
n the paper and
the
Coq mechanization:
The
following table gives a mapping between the notation i
n the paper and
the
Coq mechanization:
| | Paper | Coq mechanization |
|--------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
...
...
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ of Actris and the formalization in Coq, that are briefly discussed here.
later modalities expose that these operations perform at least three steps in
the operational semantics, and are needed to deal with the three levels of
indirection in the invariant for protocols:
1.
the
`▶`
in the
CPS encoding
of protocols,
1.
the
`▶`
in the
model
of protocols,
2.
the higher-order ghost state used for ownership of protocols, and
3.
the opening of the protocol invariant.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment