Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
Actris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Iris
Actris
Commits
e29d18e2
Commit
e29d18e2
authored
5 years ago
by
Robbert Krebbers
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add `contribution` abstraction.
parent
8cc34257
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
_CoqProject
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
_CoqProject
theories/utils/contribution.v
+140
-0
140 additions, 0 deletions
theories/utils/contribution.v
with
141 additions
and
0 deletions
_CoqProject
+
1
−
0
View file @
e29d18e2
...
...
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ theories/utils/encodable.v
theories/utils/list.v
theories/utils/compare.v
theories/utils/spin_lock.v
theories/utils/contribution.v
theories/channel/channel.v
theories/channel/proto_model.v
theories/channel/proto_channel.v
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
theories/utils/contribution.v
0 → 100644
+
140
−
0
View file @
e29d18e2
From
iris
.
base_logic
Require
Export
base_logic
lib
.
iprop
lib
.
own
.
From
iris
.
proofmode
Require
Export
tactics
.
From
iris
.
algebra
Require
Import
excl
auth
csum
gmultiset
frac_auth
.
Class
contributionG
Σ
(
A
:
ucmraT
)
`{
!
CmraDiscrete
A
}
:=
{
contribution_inG
:>
inG
Σ
(
authR
(
optionUR
(
csumR
(
prodR
positiveR
A
)
(
exclR
unitO
))))
}
.
Definition
server
`{
contributionG
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
n
:
nat
)
(
x
:
A
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
(
if
decide
(
n
=
O
)
then
x
≡
ε
∗
own
γ
(
●
(
Some
(
Cinr
(
Excl
()))))
∗
own
γ
(
◯
(
Some
(
Cinr
(
Excl
()))))
else
own
γ
(
●
(
Some
(
Cinl
(
Pos
.
of_nat
n
,
x
)))))
%
I
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
server
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
server
)
6
.
Definition
client
`{
contributionG
Σ
A
}
(
γ
:
gname
)
(
x
:
A
)
:
iProp
Σ
:=
own
γ
(
◯
(
Some
(
Cinl
(
1
%
positive
,
x
))))
.
Typeclasses
Opaque
client
.
Instance
:
Params
(
@
client
)
5
.
Section
contribution
.
Context
`{
contributionG
Σ
A
}
.
Implicit
Types
x
y
:
A
.
Global
Instance
server_ne
γ
n
:
NonExpansive
(
server
γ
n
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
server_proper
γ
n
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
server
γ
n
)
.
Proof
.
apply
(
ne_proper
_)
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
client_ne
γ
:
NonExpansive
(
client
γ
)
.
Proof
.
solve_proper
.
Qed
.
Global
Instance
client_proper
γ
:
Proper
((
≡
)
==>
(
≡
))
(
client
γ
)
.
Proof
.
apply
(
ne_proper
_)
.
Qed
.
Lemma
contribution_init
:
(|
==>
∃
γ
,
server
γ
0
ε
)
%
I
.
Proof
.
iMod
(
own_alloc
(
●
(
Some
(
Cinr
(
Excl
())))
⋅
◯
(
Some
(
Cinr
(
Excl
())))))
as
(
γ
)
"[Hγ Hγ']"
;
first
by
apply
auth_both_valid_2
.
iExists
γ
.
rewrite
/
server
.
by
case_decide
;
auto
with
iFrame
.
Qed
.
Lemma
server_0_empty
γ
x
:
server
γ
0
x
-∗
x
≡
ε
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
server
.
case_decide
=>
//.
iIntros
"[? _] //"
.
Qed
.
Lemma
server_1_agree
γ
x
y
:
server
γ
1
x
-∗
client
γ
y
-∗
⌜
x
≡
y
⌝.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
case_decide
=>
//.
iIntros
"Hs Hc"
.
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
[[[_
?]
%
(
inj
Cinl
)|
Hincl
]
%
Some_included
_]
%
auth_both_valid
;
first
done
.
move
:
Hincl
.
rewrite
Cinl_included
prod_included
/=
pos_included
=>
-
[?
_]
.
by
destruct
(
Pos
.
lt_irrefl
1
)
.
Qed
.
Lemma
server_valid
γ
n
x
:
server
γ
n
x
-∗
✓
x
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
server
.
case_decide
.
-
iDestruct
1
as
(
->
)
"_"
.
iPureIntro
.
apply
ucmra_unit_valid
.
-
iIntros
"Hs"
.
iDestruct
(
own_valid
with
"Hs"
)
as
%
Hv
.
move
:
Hv
.
by
rewrite
auth_auth_valid
=>
-
[??]
.
Qed
.
Lemma
client_valid
γ
x
:
client
γ
x
-∗
✓
x
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
client
.
iIntros
"Hs"
.
iDestruct
(
own_valid
with
"Hs"
)
as
%
Hv
.
move
:
Hv
.
by
rewrite
auth_frag_valid
=>
-
[??]
.
Qed
.
Lemma
server_agree
γ
n
x
y
:
server
γ
n
x
-∗
client
γ
y
-∗
⌜
n
≠
0
∧
y
≼
x
⌝.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
iIntros
"Hs Hc"
.
case_decide
;
subst
.
-
iDestruct
"Hs"
as
"(_ & _ & Hc')"
.
by
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hc Hc'"
)
as
%
?
.
-
iDestruct
(
own_valid_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
[[[??]
%
(
inj
Cinl
)|
Hincl
]
%
Some_included
_]
%
auth_both_valid
.
{
setoid_subst
.
by
destruct
n
.
}
move
:
Hincl
.
rewrite
Cinl_included
prod_included
/=
pos_included
=>
-
[??]
.
by
destruct
n
.
Qed
.
Lemma
alloc_client
γ
n
x
x'
y'
:
(
x
,
ε
)
~l
~>
(
x'
,
y'
)
→
server
γ
n
x
==∗
server
γ
(
S
n
)
x'
∗
client
γ
y'
.
Proof
.
intros
Hup
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
destruct
(
decide
(
n
=
0
))
as
[
->
|?];
case_decide
;
try
done
.
-
iDestruct
1
as
(
Hx
)
"[Hs Hc]"
;
setoid_subst
.
iMod
(
own_update_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
"[$ $]"
;
last
done
.
apply
auth_update
,
option_local_update
.
eapply
transitivity
with
(
Cinl
(
Pos
.
of_nat
1
,
ε
),
Cinl
(
1
%
positive
,
ε
))
.
{
apply
exclusive_local_update
.
split
;
[
done
|]
.
apply
ucmra_unit_valid
.
}
by
apply
csum_local_update_l
,
prod_local_update_2
.
-
iIntros
"Hs"
.
iMod
(
own_update
with
"Hs"
)
as
"[$ $]"
;
last
done
.
eapply
auth_update_alloc
,
transitivity
with
(
Some
(
Cinl
(
Pos
.
of_nat
(
S
n
),
x
)),
Some
(
Cinl
(
1
%
positive
,
ε
)))
.
{
rewrite
Nat2Pos
.
inj_succ
//
-
Pos
.
add_1_l
-
{
2
}(
left_id
ε
op
x
)
.
rewrite
-
(
right_id
_
_
(
Some
(
Cinl
(
1
%
positive
,
_))))
.
rewrite
-
pair_op
-
Cinl_op
Some_op
.
apply
op_local_update_discrete
.
intros
[??];
split
=>
//=.
by
rewrite
left_id
.
}
by
apply
option_local_update
,
csum_local_update_l
,
prod_local_update_2
.
Qed
.
Lemma
dealloc_client
γ
n
x
y
:
Cancelable
y
→
server
γ
n
(
x
⋅
y
)
-∗
client
γ
y
==∗
server
γ
(
pred
n
)
x
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(?)
"Hs Hc"
.
iDestruct
(
server_valid
with
"Hs"
)
as
%
Hv
.
destruct
(
decide
(
n
=
1
))
as
[
->
|];
simpl
.
-
iDestruct
(
server_1_agree
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
Hxy
.
move
:
Hxy
.
rewrite
{
1
}(
comm
_
x
)
-
{
2
}(
right_id
ε
_
y
)=>
/
cancelable
.
rewrite
{
1
}
comm
=>
/
(_
Hv
)
->
.
rewrite
left_id
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
;
repeat
case_decide
=>
//.
iMod
(
own_update_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
"[$ $]"
;
last
done
.
by
apply
auth_update
,
option_local_update
,
(
replace_local_update
_
_)
.
-
iDestruct
(
server_agree
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
[?
[
z
Hxy
]]
.
move
:
Hxy
.
rewrite
(
comm
_
x
)=>
/
cancelable
.
rewrite
{
1
}
comm
=>
/
(_
Hv
)
->
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
destruct
n
as
[|[|
n
]];
case_decide
=>
//=.
iApply
(
own_update_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
.
apply
auth_update_dealloc
.
rewrite
-
(
right_id
_
_
(
Some
(
Cinl
(
1
%
positive
,
_))))
.
rewrite
Nat2Pos
.
inj_succ
//
-
Pos
.
add_1_l
.
rewrite
-
pair_op
-
Cinl_op
Some_op
.
apply
(
cancel_local_update
_
_
_)
.
Qed
.
Lemma
update_client
γ
n
x
y
x'
y'
:
(
x
,
y
)
~l
~>
(
x'
,
y'
)
→
server
γ
n
x
-∗
client
γ
y
==∗
server
γ
n
x'
∗
client
γ
y'
.
Proof
.
iIntros
(?)
"Hs Hc"
.
destruct
(
decide
(
n
=
1
))
as
[
->
|];
simpl
.
-
iDestruct
(
server_1_agree
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
?;
setoid_subst
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
case_decide
=>
//=.
iMod
(
own_update_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
"[$ $]"
;
last
done
.
by
apply
auth_update
,
option_local_update
,
csum_local_update_l
,
prod_local_update_2
.
-
iDestruct
(
server_agree
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
%
[??]
.
rewrite
/
server
/
client
.
case_decide
=>
//=.
iMod
(
own_update_2
with
"Hs Hc"
)
as
"[$ $]"
;
last
done
.
by
apply
auth_update
,
option_local_update
,
csum_local_update_l
,
prod_local_update_2
.
Qed
.
End
contribution
.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment