Also, give all these global functors the suffix GF to avoid shadowing
such as we had with authF.

And add some type annotations for clarity.

The non applied one should be only parsing.

due to an accidental git commit --amend after a git push.

In most cases there is a lot of duplicate proof search performed by
both naive_solver and eauto. Especially since naive_solver calls its
tactic (in the case of set_solver this used to be eauto) quite eagerly
this made it very slow.

Note that set_solver is this too slow and should be improved.

In most cases there is a lot of duplicate proof search performed by
both naive_solver and eauto. Especially since naive_solver calls its
tactic (in the case of set_solver this used to be eauto) quite eagerly
this made it very slow.

Note that set_solver is this too slow and should be improved.

I added a new typeclass "inGF" to witness that a particular *functor* is part of \Sigma. inG, in contrast, witnesses a particular *CMRA* to be in there, after applying the functor to "\later iProp".
inGF can be inferred if that functor is consed to the head of \Sigma, and it is preserved by consing a new functor to \Sigma. This is not the case for inG since the recursive occurence of \Sigma also changes.
For evry construction (auth, sts, saved_prop), there is an instance infering the respective authG, stsG, savedPropG from an inGF. There is also a global inG_inGF, but Coq is unable to use it.

I tried to instead have *only* inGF, since having both typeclasses seemed weird. However, then the actual type that e.g. "own" is about is the result of applying a functor, and Coq entirely fails to infer anything.

I had to add a few type annotations in heap.v, because Coq tried to use the "authG_inGF" instance before the A got fixed, and ended up looping and expanding endlessly on that proof of timelessness.
This does not seem entirely unreasonable, I was honestly surprised Coq was able to infer the types previously.

This is all still pretty ad hoc, but oh well. Also, I have no idea why I had to make those instances in sta_dra global, but it complained about missing instances. Actually, I wonder how they could *not* be global previously...

This strengthens some lemmas that are written using the notion of closednes, shortening some proofs all the way up to barrier.v

This is still a rather horrible proof, though. More work to be done.

this makes it slightlymore annoying to use because we have to elliminate the box. one more reason to have a proof mode ;-)