- Mar 15, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 12, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 11, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 10, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for the suggestion.
-
- Mar 07, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
Add both non-expansive and contractive functors, and bundle them for the general Iris instance as well as the global functor construction This allows us to move the \later in the user-defined functor to any place we want. In particular, we can now have "\later (iProp -> iProp)" in the ghost CMRA.
-
- Mar 06, 2016
- Mar 05, 2016
- Mar 04, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Mar 02, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This cleans up some ad-hoc stuff and prepares for a generalization of saved propositions.
-
- Mar 01, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 27, 2016
- Feb 26, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 25, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
The changes are probably necessary because rewrite now tries harder not to instantiate evars, which it always said it would not do.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It now turns setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities when possible, and substitutes those.
-
- Feb 24, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
* Use sig instead of sigT: the proof is a Prop after all * Tweak implicit arguments * Shorten proof of sigma
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way it behaves better for discrete CMRAs.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Feb 23, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I am now also using reification to obtain the indexes corresponding to the stuff we want to cancel instead of relying on matching using Ltac.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Feb 22, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also, give all these global functors the suffix GF to avoid shadowing such as we had with authF. And add some type annotations for clarity.
-
Ralf Jung authored
I added a new typeclass "inGF" to witness that a particular *functor* is part of \Sigma. inG, in contrast, witnesses a particular *CMRA* to be in there, after applying the functor to "\later iProp". inGF can be inferred if that functor is consed to the head of \Sigma, and it is preserved by consing a new functor to \Sigma. This is not the case for inG since the recursive occurence of \Sigma also changes. For evry construction (auth, sts, saved_prop), there is an instance infering the respective authG, stsG, savedPropG from an inGF. There is also a global inG_inGF, but Coq is unable to use it. I tried to instead have *only* inGF, since having both typeclasses seemed weird. However, then the actual type that e.g. "own" is about is the result of applying a functor, and Coq entirely fails to infer anything. I had to add a few type annotations in heap.v, because Coq tried to use the "authG_inGF" instance before the A got fixed, and ended up looping and expanding endlessly on that proof of timelessness. This does not seem entirely unreasonable, I was honestly surprised Coq was able to infer the types previously.
-
- Feb 20, 2016
- Feb 19, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 18, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This avoids ambiguity with P and Q that we were using before for both uPreds/iProps and indexed uPreds/iProps.
-