Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit a90a8e99 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers
Browse files

CMRA structure on gsets that avoids the indirection via maps.

Also, add algebra/gset to _CoqProject.
parent c46bb2a0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ algebra/frac.v
algebra/csum.v
algebra/list.v
algebra/updates.v
algebra/gset.v
program_logic/model.v
program_logic/adequacy.v
program_logic/hoare_lifting.v
......
From iris.algebra Require Export gmap.
From iris.algebra Require Import excl.
From iris.prelude Require Import mapset.
From iris.algebra Require Export cmra.
From iris.algebra Require Import updates.
From iris.prelude Require Export collections gmap.
Definition gsetC K `{Countable K} := gmapC K (exclC unitC).
Definition to_gsetC `{Countable K} (X : gset K) : gsetC K :=
to_gmap (Excl ()) X.
Inductive gset_disj K `{Countable K} :=
| GSet : gset K gset_disj K
| GSetBot : gset_disj K.
Arguments GSet {_ _ _} _.
Arguments GSetBot {_ _ _}.
Section gset.
Context `{Countable K}.
Implicit Types X Y : gset K.
Lemma to_gsetC_empty : to_gsetC ( : gset K) = ∅.
Proof. apply to_gmap_empty. Qed.
Lemma to_gsetC_union X Y : X Y to_gsetC X to_gsetC Y = to_gsetC (X Y).
Proof.
intros HXY; apply: map_eq=> i; rewrite /to_gsetC /=.
rewrite lookup_op !lookup_to_gmap. repeat case_option_guard; set_solver.
Qed.
Lemma to_gsetC_valid X : to_gsetC X.
Proof. intros i. rewrite /to_gsetC lookup_to_gmap. by case_option_guard. Qed.
Lemma to_gsetC_valid_op X Y : (to_gsetC X to_gsetC Y) X Y.
Proof.
split; last (intros; rewrite to_gsetC_union //; apply to_gsetC_valid).
intros HXY i ??; move: (HXY i); rewrite lookup_op !lookup_to_gmap.
rewrite !option_guard_True //.
Qed.
Context `{Fresh K (gset K), !FreshSpec K (gset K)}.
Lemma updateP_alloc_strong (Q : gsetC K Prop) (I : gset K) X :
( i, i X i I Q (to_gsetC ({[i]} X))) to_gsetC X ~~>: Q.
Proof.
intros; apply updateP_alloc_strong with I (Excl ()); [done|]=> i.
rewrite /to_gsetC lookup_to_gmap_None -to_gmap_union_singleton; eauto.
Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc (Q : gsetC K Prop) X :
( i, i X Q (to_gsetC ({[i]} X))) to_gsetC X ~~>: Q.
Proof. move=>??. eapply updateP_alloc_strong with (I:=); by eauto. Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc_strong' (I : gset K) X :
to_gsetC X ~~>: λ Y : gsetC K, i, Y = to_gsetC ({[ i ]} X) i I i X.
Proof. eauto using updateP_alloc_strong. Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc' X :
to_gsetC X ~~>: λ Y : gsetC K, i, Y = to_gsetC ({[ i ]} X) i X.
Proof. eauto using updateP_alloc. Qed.
End gset.
\ No newline at end of file
Context `{Countable K}.
Arguments op _ _ !_ !_ /.
Canonical Structure gset_disjC := leibnizC (gset_disj K).
Instance gset_disj_valid : Valid (gset_disj K) := λ X,
match X with GSet _ => True | GSetBot => False end.
Instance gset_disj_empty : Empty (gset_disj K) := GSet ∅.
Instance gset_disj_op : Op (gset_disj K) := λ X Y,
match X, Y with
| GSet X, GSet Y => if decide (X Y) then GSet (X Y) else GSetBot
| _, _ => GSetBot
end.
Instance gset_disj_pcore : PCore (gset_disj K) := λ _, Some ∅.
Ltac gset_disj_solve :=
repeat (simpl || case_decide);
first [apply (f_equal GSet)|done|exfalso]; set_solver by eauto.
Lemma gset_disj_valid_inv_l X Y : (GSet X Y) Y', Y = GSet Y' X Y'.
Proof. destruct Y; repeat (simpl || case_decide); by eauto. Qed.
Lemma gset_disj_union X Y : X Y GSet X GSet Y = GSet (X Y).
Proof. intros. by rewrite /= decide_True. Qed.
Lemma gset_disj_valid_op X Y : (GSet X GSet Y) X Y.
Proof. simpl. case_decide; by split. Qed.
Lemma gset_disj_ra_mixin : RAMixin (gset_disj K).
Proof.
apply ra_total_mixin; eauto.
- intros [?|]; destruct 1; gset_disj_solve.
- by constructor.
- by destruct 1.
- intros [X1|] [X2|] [X3|]; gset_disj_solve.
- intros [X1|] [X2|]; gset_disj_solve.
- intros [X|]; gset_disj_solve.
- exists (GSet ); gset_disj_solve.
- intros [X1|] [X2|]; gset_disj_solve.
Qed.
Canonical Structure gset_disjR := discreteR (gset_disj K) gset_disj_ra_mixin.
Lemma gset_disj_ucmra_mixin : UCMRAMixin (gset_disj K).
Proof. split; try apply _ || done. intros [X|]; gset_disj_solve. Qed.
Canonical Structure gset_disjUR :=
discreteUR (gset_disj K) gset_disj_ra_mixin gset_disj_ucmra_mixin.
Context `{Fresh K (gset K), !FreshSpec K (gset K)}.
Arguments op _ _ _ _ : simpl never.
Lemma updateP_alloc_strong (Q : gset_disj K Prop) (I : gset K) X :
( i, i X i I Q (GSet ({[i]} X))) GSet X ~~>: Q.
Proof.
intros HQ; apply cmra_discrete_updateP=> ? /gset_disj_valid_inv_l [Y [->?]].
destruct (exist_fresh (X Y I)) as [i ?].
exists (GSet ({[ i ]} X)); split.
- apply HQ; set_solver by eauto.
- apply gset_disj_valid_op. set_solver by eauto.
Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc (Q : gset_disj K Prop) X :
( i, i X Q (GSet ({[i]} X))) GSet X ~~>: Q.
Proof. move=>??. eapply updateP_alloc_strong with (I:=); by eauto. Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc_strong' (I : gset K) X :
GSet X ~~>: λ Y, i, Y = GSet ({[ i ]} X) i I i X.
Proof. eauto using updateP_alloc_strong. Qed.
Lemma updateP_alloc' X : GSet X ~~>: λ Y, i, Y = GSet ({[ i ]} X) i X.
Proof. eauto using updateP_alloc. Qed.
End gset.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment