Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Verified Commit e85a1027 authored by Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar Paolo G. Giarrusso
Browse files

Sketch proof

parent 8d0ef7c5
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -72,6 +72,13 @@ This rule looks different from the above ones, because we still do not have that
\inferH{later-fake-rule}{\timeless{\prop}}
{\later\prop \proves \prop}
\end{mathpar}
The proof of the former is $\later \prop \proves \diamond \prop =
\later\FALSE \lor \prop$, and then by straightforward disjunction elimination:
% Cut the second part if trivial.
\begin{mathpar}
\infer{\later\FALSE \proves \later \propB \and \prop \proves \later \propB}
{\later\FALSE \lor \prop \proves \propB}
\end{mathpar}
The following rules can be derived about except-0:
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment