Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 725a6297 authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

expand changelog

parent 9064e78f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -23,12 +23,17 @@ Changes in and extensions of the theory: ...@@ -23,12 +23,17 @@ Changes in and extensions of the theory:
Changes in Coq: Changes in Coq:
* An all-new generalized proofmode that abstracts away from Iris! The proofmode * An all-new generalized proof mode that abstracts away from Iris! See
can now be used with logics derived from Iris (like iGPS), with <http://iris-project.org/mosel/> for the corresponding paper. Major new
non-step-indexed logics and even with non-affine (i.e., linear) logics. See features:
<http://iris-project.org/mosel/> for the corresponding paper. - The proof mode can now be used with logics derived from Iris (like iGPS),
Developments instantiating the proofmode typeclasses may need significant with non-step-indexed logics and even with non-affine (i.e., linear) logics.
changes. For developments just using the proofmode tactics, porting should - `iModIntro` is more flexible and more powerful, it now also subsumes
`iNext` and `iAlways`.
- General infrastructure for deriving a logic for monotone predicates over
an existing logic (see the paper for more details).
Developments instantiating the proof mode typeclasses may need significant
changes. For developments just using the proof mode tactics, porting should
not be too much effort. Notable things to port are: not be too much effort. Notable things to port are:
- All the BI laws moved from the `uPred` module to the `bi` module. For - All the BI laws moved from the `uPred` module to the `bi` module. For
example, `uPred.later_equivI` became `bi.later_equivI`. example, `uPred.later_equivI` became `bi.later_equivI`.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment