A more intuitive proof that lists from a COFE

See merge request iris/iris!239

Add synopsis so make build-dep does not complain

See merge request iris/iris!238

Paolo G. Giarrusso authored 5 years ago and Ralf Jung committed 5 years ago

Nitpick, yes, but I've seen the complaint enough times today to bother.

That complaint is only useful to maintainers, and it's even in color.

```
[WARNING] Failed checks on coq-iris-builddep package definition from source at file:///Users/pgiarrusso/git/Coq/0IRIS-SWITCH/iris/build-dep:
    error 57: Synopsis and description must not be both empty
```

This proof also more easily scales to other recursive types, like
trees etc.

Notably, `big_andL_andL` and `big_andL_and` where a ⊣⊢ and ⊢ version
of the same lemma. I favored the `big_opL_op` naming scheme.

Allow multiple arguments in `iEval .. in` and `iSimpl in`.

Closes #238

See merge request iris/iris!237

Fix documentation for ofe_funR

See merge request iris/iris!236

This comment wasn't updated after
866cad62.

Avoid conversion after only reducing goal.

See merge request iris/iris!235

If Ralf didn't know it, I guess it deserves a name. This is the first I got,
feel free to improve.

That's the documentation I'd have wanted to see, and viceversa the lack of this
rule implied (to me) that this wouldn't work.

Nicer soundness for our update modalities

See merge request iris/iris!230