- Nov 15, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It does not really help since the main work of the proof is in showing that `cFunctor_map F (iProp_fold, iProp_unfold)` is injective, but whatever.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Oct 28, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way, it can be used with `iApply`.
-
- Oct 25, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Jun 27, 2017
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Feb 06, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jan 09, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jan 05, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Jan 03, 2017
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
This patch was created using find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 ' and some minor manual editing
-
- Dec 09, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Nov 24, 2016
-
-
Jacques-Henri Jourdan authored
The idea on magic wand is to use it for curried lemmas and use ⊢ for uncurried lemmas.
-
- Nov 22, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Nov 17, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Nov 03, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The old choice for ★ was a arbitrary: the precedence of the ASCII asterisk * was fixed at a wrong level in Coq, so we had to pick another symbol. The ★ was a random choice from a unicode chart. The new symbol ∗ (as proposed by David Swasey) corresponds better to conventional practise and matches the symbol we use on paper.
-
- Oct 28, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Oct 25, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Sep 20, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Aug 11, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It is not non-expansive, so not a function we should use.
-
- Aug 09, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- Aug 08, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This makes stuff more uniform and also removes the need for the [inGFs] type class. Instead, there is now a type class [subG Σ1 Σ2] which expresses that a list of functors [Σ1] is contained in [Σ2].
-
- Aug 05, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This commit features: - A simpler model. The recursive domain equation no longer involves a triple containing invariants, physical state and ghost state, but just ghost state. Invariants and physical state are encoded using (higher-order) ghost state. - (Primitive) view shifts are formalized in the logic and all properties about it are proven in the logic instead of the model. Instead, the core logic features only a notion of raw view shifts which internalizing performing frame preserving updates. - A better behaved notion of mask changing view shifts. In particular, we no longer have side-conditions on transitivity of view shifts, and we have a rule for introduction of mask changing view shifts |={E1,E2}=> P with E2 ⊆ E1 which allows to postpone performing a view shift. - The weakest precondition connective is formalized in the logic using Banach's fixpoint. All properties about the connective are proven in the logic instead of directly in the model. - Adequacy is proven in the logic and uses a primitive form of adequacy for uPred that only involves raw views shifts and laters. Some remarks: - I have removed binary view shifts. I did not see a way to describe all rules of the new mask changing view shifts using those. - There is no longer the need for the notion of "frame shifting assertions" and these are thus removed. The rules for Hoare triples are thus also stated in terms of primitive view shifts. TODO: - Maybe rename primitive view shift into something more sensible - Figure out a way to deal with closed proofs (see the commented out stuff in tests/heap_lang and tests/barrier_client).
-
- May 31, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
. This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →. -
Robbert Krebbers authored
It used to be: (P ={E}=> Q) := (True ⊢ (P → |={E}=> Q)) Now it is: (P ={E}=> Q) := (P ⊢ |={E}=> Q)
-
- May 29, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 15, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 11, 2016
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- Mar 10, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for the suggestion.
-
- Mar 07, 2016
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
So, only use the type class for contractive functors.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-