Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jan 24, 2019
  2. Dec 25, 2018
  3. Nov 29, 2018
  4. Oct 03, 2018
  5. Sep 12, 2018
  6. Jun 16, 2018
  7. Jun 15, 2018
  8. Feb 15, 2018
  9. Dec 23, 2017
  10. Nov 22, 2017
  11. Nov 13, 2017
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Improved treatment of anonymous hypotheses in the proof mode. · bb3584e7
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      The proof mode now explicitly keeps track of anonymous hypotheses (i.e.
      hypotheses that are introduced by the introduction pattern `?`). Consider:
      
        Lemma foo {M} (P Q R : uPred M) : P -∗ (Q ∗ R) -∗ Q ∗ P.
        Proof. iIntros "? [H ?]". iFrame "H". iFrame. Qed.
      
      After the `iIntros`, the goal will be:
      
        _ : P
        "H" : Q
        _ : R
        --------------------------------------∗
        Q ∗ P
      
      Anonymous hypotheses are displayed in a special way (`_ : P`). An important
      property of the new anonymous hypotheses is that it is no longer possible to
      refer to them by name, whereas before, anonymous hypotheses were given some
      arbitrary fresh name (typically prefixed by `~`).
      
      Note tactics can still operate on these anonymous hypotheses. For example, both
      `iFrame` and `iAssumption`, as well as the symbolic execution tactics, will
      use them. The only thing that is not possible is to refer to them yourself,
      for example, in an introduction, specialization or selection pattern.
      
      Advantages of the new approach:
      
      - Proofs become more robust as one cannot accidentally refer to anonymous
        hypotheses by their fresh name.
      - Fresh name generation becomes considerably easier. Since anonymous hypotheses
        are internally represented by natural numbers (of type `N`), we can just fold
        over the hypotheses and take the max plus one. This thus solve issue #101.
      bb3584e7
  12. Oct 30, 2017
  13. Oct 28, 2017
  14. Oct 27, 2017
  15. Oct 26, 2017
  16. Feb 06, 2017
  17. Jan 05, 2017
  18. Jan 03, 2017
  19. Dec 09, 2016
  20. Nov 10, 2016
  21. Sep 27, 2016
  22. Sep 20, 2016
  23. Jun 01, 2016
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Make iFresh faster on environments containing evars. · 09b1563c
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Generating a fresh name consists of two stages:
      + Use [cbv] to compute a list representing the domain of the environment. This
        is a very simply computation that just erases the hypotheses.
      + Use [vm_compute] to compute a fresh name based on the list representing the
        domain. The domain itself should never contain evars, so [vm_compute] will
        do the job.
      09b1563c
  24. May 07, 2016
  25. Apr 12, 2016
  26. Apr 11, 2016
Loading