This is in preparation for coq/coq#9274.

If the accessor introduces a binder, the first Coq-level intro pattern of `iInv`
is used for that binder unless the type of the binder is unit, in which case
`iInv` removes it completely.  Binders on the closing view shift are not (yet)
supported as they are harder to smoothly eliminate in the unit case.

New IntoAcc typeclass to decouple creating and elliminating accessors; ElimInv supports both with and without Hclose

Extend ElimModal with Boolean flags to specify whether it operates on the persistent/spatial context.

This requires changing the Hint Mode of the [Frame] type class because it should not fail if its parameter is an evar, but instantiate it instead. In order to prevent all the other instances of [Frame] to intantiate this evar themselves, we create a new type class [KnwonFrame], which corresponds to the old behavior.

This is to be used on top of stdpp's 4b5d254e.

For obsolete reasons, that no longer seem to apply, we used ∅ as the
unit.

This patch was created using

  find -name *.v | xargs -L 1 awk -i inplace '{from = 0} /^From/{ from = 1; ever_from = 1} { if (from == 0 && seen == 0 && ever_from == 1) { print "Set Default Proof Using \"Type*\"."; seen = 1 } }1 '

and some minor manual editing

    The idea on magic wand is to use it for curried lemmas and use ⊢ for uncurried lemmas.

Robbert Krebbers authored 8 years ago and Ralf Jung committed 8 years ago

We do this by introducing a type class UpClose with notation ↑.

The reason for this change is as follows: since `nclose : namespace
→ coPset` is declared as a coercion, the notation `nclose N ⊆ E` was
pretty printed as `N ⊆ E`. However, `N ⊆ E` could not be typechecked
because type checking goes from left to right, and as such would look
for an instance `SubsetEq namespace`, which causes the right hand side
to be ill-typed.

There is no way to infer the cmra A, so we make it explicit.

The old choice for ★ was a arbitrary: the precedence of the ASCII asterisk *
was fixed at a wrong level in Coq, so we had to pick another symbol. The ★ was
a random choice from a unicode chart.

The new symbol ∗ (as proposed by David Swasey) corresponds better to
conventional practise and matches the symbol we use on paper.