Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit a0b4ccc2 authored by Dan Frumin's avatar Dan Frumin
Browse files

fix typo

parent eaeb5851
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ With this lemma in hand, the proof of \thmref{thm:counterexample-1} is simple. ...@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ With this lemma in hand, the proof of \thmref{thm:counterexample-1} is simple.
\label{app:section:invariants-without-a-later} \label{app:section:invariants-without-a-later}
Now we come to the main paradox: if we remove the $\later$ from \ruleref{inv-open}, the logic becomes inconsistent. Now we come to the main paradox: if we remove the $\later$ from \ruleref{inv-open}, the logic becomes inconsistent.
The theorem is stated as general as possible so taht it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris. The theorem is stated as general as possible so that it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
\begin{thm} \begin{thm}
\label{thm:counterexample-2} \label{thm:counterexample-2}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment