Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9d04874f authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

fix changelog style

parent a3bed7ea
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ lemma.
**Changes in `proofmode`:**
* `iAssumption` no longer instantiates evar premises with `False`. This used
to occur when the conclusion contains variables that are not in scope of the
evar, thus blocking the default behavior of instantiating the premise with
the conclusion. The old behavior can be emulated with`iExFalso. iExact "H".`
* `iInduction` now supports induction schemes that involve `Forall` and
* Change `iAssumption` to no longer instantiate evar premises with `False`. This
used to occur when the conclusion contains variables that are not in scope of
the evar, thus blocking the default behavior of instantiating the premise with
the conclusion. The old behavior can be emulated with`iExFalso. iExact "H".`
* In `iInduction`, support induction schemes that involve `Forall` and
`Forall2` (for example, for trees with finite branching).
**Changes in `base_logic`:**
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ lemma.
**Changes in `iris_heap_lang`:**
* Changed the `num_laters_per_step` of `heap_lang` to `λ n, n`, signifying that
* Change the `num_laters_per_step` of `heap_lang` to `λ n, n`, signifying that
each step of the weakest precondition strips `n` laters, where `n` is the
number of steps taken so far. This number is tied to ghost state in the state
interpretation, which is exposed, updated, and used with new lemmas
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment