Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9bd742a2 authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

add links

parent eb4d4a60
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -15,7 +15,12 @@ Chajed. Thanks a lot to everyone involved! ...@@ -15,7 +15,12 @@ Chajed. Thanks a lot to everyone involved!
The highlight of this release is the completely re-engineered interactive proof The highlight of this release is the completely re-engineered interactive proof
mode. Not only did many tactics become more powerful; the entire proof mode can mode. Not only did many tactics become more powerful; the entire proof mode can
now be used not just for Iris but also for other separation logics satisfying now be used not just for Iris but also for other separation logics satisfying
the proof mode interface. the proof mode interface (e.g., [Iron] and [GPFSL]). Also see the
[accompanying paper][MoSeL].
[Iron]: https://iris-project.org/iron/
[GPFSL]: https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/gpfsl/
[MoSeL]: https://iris-project.org/mosel/
Beyond that, the Iris program logic gained the ability to reason about Beyond that, the Iris program logic gained the ability to reason about
potentially stuck programs, and a significantly strengthened adequacy theorem potentially stuck programs, and a significantly strengthened adequacy theorem
...@@ -92,8 +97,7 @@ Changes in heap_lang: ...@@ -92,8 +97,7 @@ Changes in heap_lang:
Changes in Coq: Changes in Coq:
* An all-new generalized proof mode that abstracts away from Iris! See * An all-new generalized proof mode that abstracts away from Iris! Major new
<http://iris-project.org/mosel/> for the corresponding paper. Major new
features: features:
- The proof mode can now be used with logics derived from Iris (like iGPS), - The proof mode can now be used with logics derived from Iris (like iGPS),
with non-step-indexed logics and even with non-affine (i.e., linear) logics. with non-step-indexed logics and even with non-affine (i.e., linear) logics.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment