Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 4a59814e authored by Ralf Jung's avatar Ralf Jung
Browse files

fix typo (thanks Paolo)

parent 141a635e
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Section increment. ...@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Section increment.
Qed. Qed.
(** A proof of the incr specification that uses lemmas ([aacc_aupd_*]) to (** A proof of the incr specification that uses lemmas ([aacc_aupd_*]) to
avoid reasining with the definition of atomic accessors. These lemmas are avoid reasoning with the definition of atomic accessors. These lemmas are
only usable here because the atomic update we have and the one we try to only usable here because the atomic update we have and the one we try to
prove are in 1:1 correspondence; most logically atomic proofs will not be prove are in 1:1 correspondence; most logically atomic proofs will not be
able to use them. *) able to use them. *)
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment