Deprecate ltn leq trans
All threads resolved!
All threads resolved!
I think it's fine (as stated in the comment) to add ltn_leq_trans
, but having a warning message when using it may help users to realize that n < m
is just a notation for n.+1 <= m
, which can be useful to better use ssrnat.
If this is deemed a bad idea, feel free to just close this merge request.
More generally, there are probably a bunch of things in util that could/should be offered as pull request upstream to MathComp.
Merge request reports
Activity
- Resolved by Björn Brandenburg
Thanks, Pierre! The change is fine with me.
I don't have a good sense for what parts of
util
might be interesting for upstream. If you point out which lemmas seem worthwhile, I'd be happy to help prepare MRs against mathcomp.
assigned to @bbb
Please register or sign in to reply