Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Yixuan Chen
Iris
Commits
b902393a
Commit
b902393a
authored
9 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
ghost_ownership: prove frame-preserving update from empty
parent
b7d31005
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
program_logic/ghost_ownership.v
+23
-5
23 additions, 5 deletions
program_logic/ghost_ownership.v
with
23 additions
and
5 deletions
program_logic/ghost_ownership.v
+
23
−
5
View file @
b902393a
...
...
@@ -74,21 +74,39 @@ Proof.
by
rewrite
-
(
exist_intro
γ
)
.
Qed
.
Lemma
pvs
_updateP
E
γ
a
P
:
Lemma
own
_updateP
E
γ
a
P
:
a
~~>:
P
→
own
i
γ
a
⊑
pvs
E
E
(
∃
a'
,
■
P
a'
∧
own
i
γ
a'
)
.
Proof
.
intros
Ha
.
rewrite
-
(
pvs_mono
_
_
(
∃
m
,
■
(
∃
b
,
m
=
to_globalC
i
γ
b
∧
P
b
)
∧
ownG
m
)
%
I
)
.
rewrite
-
(
pvs_mono
_
_
(
∃
m
,
■
(
∃
a'
,
m
=
to_globalC
i
γ
a'
∧
P
a'
)
∧
ownG
m
)
%
I
)
.
*
eapply
pvs_ownG_updateP
,
iprod_singleton_updateP
;
first
(
eapply
map_singleton_updateP'
,
cmra_transport_updateP'
,
Ha
)
.
first
by
(
eapply
map_singleton_updateP'
,
cmra_transport_updateP'
,
Ha
)
.
naive_solver
.
*
apply
exist_elim
=>
m
;
apply
const_elim_l
=>
-
[
a'
[
->
HP
]]
.
rewrite
-
(
exist_intro
a'
)
.
by
apply
and_intro
;
[
apply
const_intro
|]
.
Qed
.
Lemma
pvs_update
E
γ
a
a'
:
a
~~>
a'
→
own
i
γ
a
⊑
pvs
E
E
(
own
i
γ
a'
)
.
Lemma
own_updateP_empty
`{
Empty
A
,
!
CMRAIdentity
A
}
E
γ
a
P
:
∅
~~>:
P
→
True
⊑
pvs
E
E
(
∃
a
,
■
P
a
∧
own
i
γ
a
)
.
Proof
.
intros
;
rewrite
(
pvs_updateP
E
_
_
(
a'
=
));
last
by
apply
cmra_update_updateP
.
intros
Hemp
.
rewrite
-
(
pvs_mono
_
_
(
∃
m
,
■
(
∃
a'
,
m
=
to_globalC
i
γ
a'
∧
P
a'
)
∧
ownG
m
)
%
I
)
.
*
eapply
pvs_ownG_updateP_empty
,
iprod_singleton_updateP_empty
with
(
x
:=
i
);
first
by
(
eapply
map_singleton_updateP_empty'
,
cmra_transport_updateP'
,
Hemp
)
.
naive_solver
.
*
apply
exist_elim
=>
m
;
apply
const_elim_l
=>
-
[
a'
[
->
HP
]]
.
rewrite
-
(
exist_intro
a'
)
.
by
apply
and_intro
;
[
apply
const_intro
|]
.
Unshelve
.
(* We have to prove that we actually follow the identity laws on the "other side". *)
split
.
-
apply
cmra_transport_valid
,
cmra_empty_valid
.
-
move
=>
b
.
by
rewrite
-
cmra_transport_back_op_r
left_id
cmra_transport_back_and
.
-
apply
_
.
Qed
.
Lemma
own_update
E
γ
a
a'
:
a
~~>
a'
→
own
i
γ
a
⊑
pvs
E
E
(
own
i
γ
a'
)
.
Proof
.
intros
;
rewrite
(
own_updateP
E
_
_
(
a'
=
));
last
by
apply
cmra_update_updateP
.
by
apply
pvs_mono
,
uPred
.
exist_elim
=>
m''
;
apply
uPred
.
const_elim_l
=>
->
.
Qed
.
End
global
.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment