Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Yixuan Chen
Iris
Commits
74ca0005
Commit
74ca0005
authored
9 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
hard-wire the auth construction to timeless CMRAs
parent
2c1b15dc
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
program_logic/auth.v
+24
-17
24 additions, 17 deletions
program_logic/auth.v
with
24 additions
and
17 deletions
program_logic/auth.v
+
24
−
17
View file @
74ca0005
...
...
@@ -3,14 +3,23 @@ Require Export program_logic.invariants program_logic.ghost_ownership.
Import
uPred
.
Section
auth
.
Context
{
A
:
cmraT
}
`{
Empty
A
,
!
CMRAIdentity
A
}
.
Context
{
A
:
cmraT
}
`{
Empty
A
,
!
CMRAIdentity
A
}
`{
!∀
a
:
A
,
Timeless
a
}
.
Context
{
Λ
:
language
}
{
Σ
:
gid
→
iFunctor
}
(
AuthI
:
gid
)
`{
!
InG
Λ
Σ
AuthI
(
authRA
A
)}
.
(* TODO: Come up with notation for "iProp Λ (globalC Σ)". *)
Context
(
N
:
namespace
)
(
φ
:
A
→
iProp
Λ
(
globalC
Σ
))
.
Implicit
Types
P
Q
R
:
iProp
Λ
(
globalC
Σ
)
.
Implicit
Types
a
b
:
A
.
Implicit
Types
γ
:
gname
.
(* Adding this locally only, since it overlaps with Auth_timelss in algebra/auth.v.
TODO: Would moving this to auth.v and making it global break things? *)
Local
Instance
AuthA_timeless
(
x
:
auth
A
)
:
Timeless
x
.
Proof
.
(* FIXME: "destruct x; auto with typeclass_instances" should find this through Auth, right? *)
destruct
x
.
apply
Auth_timeless
;
apply
_
.
Qed
.
(* TODO: Need this to be proven somewhere. *)
(* FIXME ✓ binds too strong, I need parenthesis here. *)
Hypothesis
auth_valid
:
...
...
@@ -38,15 +47,16 @@ Section auth.
Context
{
Hφ
:
∀
n
,
Proper
(
dist
n
==>
dist
n
)
φ
}
.
Lemma
auth_opened
a
γ
:
(
auth_inv
γ
★
auth_own
γ
a
)
⊑
(
∃
a'
,
φ
(
a
⋅
a'
)
★
own
AuthI
γ
(
●
(
a
⋅
a'
)
⋅
◯
a
))
.
Lemma
auth_opened
E
a
γ
:
(
▷
auth_inv
γ
★
auth_own
γ
a
)
⊑
pvs
E
E
(
∃
a'
,
▷
φ
(
a
⋅
a'
)
★
own
AuthI
γ
(
●
(
a
⋅
a'
)
⋅
◯
a
))
.
Proof
.
rewrite
/
auth_inv
.
rewrite
sep_exist_r
.
apply
exist_elim
=>
b
.
rewrite
/
auth_own
[(_
★
φ
_)
%
I
]
commutative
-
associative
-
own_op
.
rewrite
/
auth_inv
.
rewrite
later_exist
sep_exist_r
.
apply
exist_elim
=>
b
.
rewrite
later_sep
[(
▷
own
_
_
_)
%
I
]
pvs_timeless
!
pvs_frame_r
.
apply
pvs_mono
.
rewrite
/
auth_own
[(_
★
▷
φ
_)
%
I
]
commutative
-
associative
-
own_op
.
rewrite
own_valid_r
auth_valid
!
sep_exist_l
/=.
apply
exist_elim
=>
a'
.
rewrite
[
∅
⋅
_]
left_id
-
(
exist_intro
a'
)
.
apply
(
eq_rewrite
b
(
a
⋅
a'
)
(
λ
x
,
φ
x
★
own
AuthI
γ
(
●
x
⋅
◯
a
))
%
I
)
.
(
λ
x
,
▷
φ
x
★
own
AuthI
γ
(
●
x
⋅
◯
a
))
%
I
)
.
{
(* TODO this asks for automation. *)
move
=>
n
a1
a2
Ha
.
by
rewrite
!
Ha
.
}
{
by
rewrite
!
sep_elim_r
.
}
...
...
@@ -66,13 +76,11 @@ Section auth.
by
apply
own_update
,
(
auth_local_update_l
L
)
.
Qed
.
(* FIXME it should be enough to assume that A is all-timeless. *)
(* Notice how the user has to prove that `b⋅a'` is valid at all
step-indices.
This is because the side-conditions for frame-preserving
updates have to be shown on the meta-level.
*)
step-indices.
However, since A is timeless, that should not be
a restriction.
*)
(* TODO The form of the lemma, with a very specific post-condition, is not ideal. *)
Lemma
auth_pvs
`{
!∀
a
:
authRA
A
,
Timeless
a
}`{
!
LocalUpdate
Lv
L
}
E
P
(
Q
:
A
→
iProp
Λ
(
globalC
Σ
))
γ
a
:
Lemma
auth_pvs
`{
!
LocalUpdate
Lv
L
}
E
P
(
Q
:
A
→
iProp
Λ
(
globalC
Σ
))
γ
a
:
nclose
N
⊆
E
→
(
auth_ctx
γ
★
auth_own
γ
a
★
(
∀
a'
,
▷
φ
(
a
⋅
a'
)
-★
pvs
(
E
∖
nclose
N
)
(
E
∖
nclose
N
)
...
...
@@ -82,12 +90,11 @@ Section auth.
rewrite
/
auth_ctx
=>
HN
.
rewrite
-
[
pvs
E
E
_]
pvs_open_close
;
last
eassumption
.
apply
sep_mono
;
first
done
.
apply
wand_intro_l
.
rewrite
[
auth_own
_
_]
later_intro
associative
-
later_sep
.
rewrite
auth_opened
later_exist
sep_exist_r
.
apply
exist_elim
=>
a'
.
rewrite
(
forall_elim
a'
)
.
rewrite
[(
▷_
★
_)
%
I
]
commutative
later_sep
.
rewrite
associative
wand_elim_l
pvs_frame_r
.
apply
pvs_strip_pvs
.
rewrite
[(
▷
own
_
_
_)
%
I
]
pvs_timeless
pvs_frame_l
.
apply
pvs_strip_pvs
.
rewrite
-!
associative
.
apply
const_elim_sep_l
=>
-
[
HL
Hv
]
.
rewrite
associative
auth_opened
!
pvs_frame_r
!
sep_exist_r
.
apply
pvs_strip_pvs
.
apply
exist_elim
=>
a'
.
rewrite
(
forall_elim
a'
)
.
rewrite
[(
▷_
★
_)
%
I
]
commutative
.
rewrite
-
[((_
★
▷_
)
★
_)
%
I
]
associative
wand_elim_r
pvs_frame_l
.
apply
pvs_strip_pvs
.
rewrite
commutative
-!
associative
.
apply
const_elim_sep_l
=>
-
[
HL
Hv
]
.
rewrite
associative
[(_
★
Q
_)
%
I
]
commutative
-
associative
auth_closing
//
;
[]
.
erewrite
pvs_frame_l
.
apply
pvs_mono
.
rewrite
associative
[(_
★
Q
_)
%
I
]
commutative
associative
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment