Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Iris
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Terraform modules
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Yixuan Chen
Iris
Commits
6e22d910
Commit
6e22d910
authored
2 years ago
by
Ralf Jung
Committed by
Robbert Krebbers
2 years ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
explain why IntoLaterN uses MakeLaterN
parent
a23a774d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
iris/proofmode/class_instances_later.v
+4
-0
4 additions, 0 deletions
iris/proofmode/class_instances_later.v
with
4 additions
and
0 deletions
iris/proofmode/class_instances_later.v
+
4
−
0
View file @
6e22d910
...
...
@@ -282,6 +282,10 @@ Global Instance into_laterN_later only_head n n' m' P Q lQ :
progress, but there may still be a left-over (i.e. [n']) to cancel more deeply
into [P], as such, we continue with [MaybeIntoLaterN]. *)
TCIf
(
TCEq
1
m'
)
(
IntoLaterN
only_head
n'
P
Q
)
(
MaybeIntoLaterN
only_head
n'
P
Q
)
→
(* Similar to [iFrame], the [iNext] tactic also performs a traversal through a
term (a hypothesis) to find laters to strip. And like [iFrame] we don't want
this to be excessively smart. So we use the same typeclass as [iFrame] here.
*)
MakeLaterN
m'
Q
lQ
→
IntoLaterN
only_head
n
(
▷
P
)
lQ
|
2
.
Proof
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment