base.v 50.4 KB
Newer Older
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2017, Coq-std++ developers. *)
2
3
4
5
6
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, collections, and various other data
structures. *)
7

8
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses List Bool Utf8 Setoid.
9
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
10
11
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(** Enable implicit generalization. *)
(* This option enables implicit generalization in arguments of the form
   `{...} (i.e., anonymous arguments).  Unfortunately, it also enables
   implicit generalization in `Instance`.  We think that the fact taht both
   behaviors are coupled together is a [bug in
   Coq](https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6030). *)
Global Generalizable All Variables.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
(** * Tweak program *)
(** 1. Since we only use Program to solve logical side-conditions, they should
always be made Opaque, otherwise we end up with performance problems due to
Coq blindly unfolding them.

Note that in most cases we use [Next Obligation. (* ... *) Qed.], for which
this option does not matter. However, sometimes we write things like
[Solve Obligations with naive_solver (* ... *)], and then the obligations
should surely be opaque. *)
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.

(** 2. Do not let Program automatically simplify obligations. The default
obligation tactic is [Tactics.program_simpl], which, among other things,
introduces all variables and gives them fresh names. As such, it becomes
impossible to refer to hypotheses in a robust way. *)
36
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
37
38

(** 3. Hide obligations from the results of the [Search] commands. *)
39
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
40

41
(** * Sealing off definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
42
43
44
45
Section seal.
  Local Set Primitive Projections.
  Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
46
47
Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
48

49
(** * Typeclass opaque definitions *)
50
51
52
53
54
55
(* The constant [tc_opaque] is used to make definitions opaque for just type
class search. Note that [simpl] is set up to always unfold [tc_opaque]. *)
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.

56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
(* Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:

  Existing Class or.
  Existing Class and.

If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.

These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the [Or]
class, instead of defining two instances [P → Q1 → R] and [P → Q2 → R] we could
have one instance [P → Or Q1 Q2 → R]. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive [P] twice. *)
72
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
73
74
75
76
77
  | TCOr_l : P1  TCOr P1 P2
  | TCOr_r : P2  TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
78

79
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1  P2  TCAnd P1 P2.
80
81
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
82

83
84
85
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
86

87
88
89
90
91
92
93
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A  Prop) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
  | TCForall_cons x xs : P x  TCForall P xs  TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
Inductive TCForall2 {A B} (P : A  B  Prop) : list A  list B  Prop :=
  | TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
  | TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
     P x y  TCForall2 P xs ys  TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.

102
103
104
105
Inductive TCEq {A} (x : A) : A  Prop := TCEq_refl : TCEq x x.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.

106
(** Throughout this development we use [stdpp_scope] for all general purpose
107
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope. *)
108
109
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
110

111
(** Change [True] and [False] into notations in order to enable overloading.
112
113
We will use this to give [True] and [False] a different interpretation for
embedded logics. *)
114
115
Notation "'True'" := True : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False : type_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
117


118
(** * Equality *)
119
(** Introduce some Haskell style like notations. *)
120
121
122
123
124
125
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x =)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ≠)" := (λ y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠ x )" := (λ y, y  x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126

127
Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) => reflexivity.
128
Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => discriminate.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129

130
131
132
133
Instance: @PreOrder A (=).
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.

(** ** Setoid equality *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
134
135
136
(** We define an operational type class for setoid equality, i.e., the
"canonical" equivalence for a type. The typeclass is tied to the \equiv
symbol. This is based on (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011). *)
137
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
138
139
140
(* No Hint Mode set because of Coq bug #5735
Hint Mode Equiv ! : typeclass_instances. *)

141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≡)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X  Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≢)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
149
150
151
152
153
154

(** The type class [LeibnizEquiv] collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic [fold_leibniz] to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and [unfold_leibniz] for the
reverse. *)
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x  y  x = y.
155
156
Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.

157
158
159
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (@equiv A _)} (x y : A) :
  x  y  x = y.
Proof. split. apply leibniz_equiv. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
160

161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
  | H : context [ @equiv ?A _ _ _ ] |- _ =>
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
  | |- context [ @equiv ?A _ _ _ ] =>
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
  | H : context [ @eq ?A _ _ ] |- _ =>
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
  | |- context [ @eq ?A _ _ ] =>
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.

Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).

(** A [Params f n] instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first [n] arguments of the function [f]. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development. *)
Instance: Params (@equiv) 2.

(** The following instance forces [setoid_replace] to use setoid equality
(for types that have an [Equiv] instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality. *)
Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation () | 3.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption.


(** * Type classes *)
(** ** Decidable propositions *)
(** This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable
194
propositions. *)
195
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
196
Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.

(** Although [RelDecision R] is just [∀ x y, Decision (R x y)], we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:

- It allows us to control [Hint Mode] more precisely. In particular, if it were
  defined as a notation, the above [Hint Mode] for [Decision] would not prevent
  diverging instance search when looking for [RelDecision (@eq ?A)], which would
  result in it looking for [Decision (@eq ?A x y)], i.e. an instance where the
  head position of [Decision] is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of
  propositions by [vm_compute]. This inefficiency arises for example if
  [(x = y) := (f x = f y)]. Since [decide (x = y)] evaluates to
  [decide (f x = f y)], this would then lead to evaluation of [f x] and [f y].
  Using the [RelDecision], the [f] is hidden under a lambda, which prevents
  unnecessary evaluation. *)
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) :=
  decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (@eq A)).
218
219
220
221

(** ** Inhabited types *)
(** This type class collects types that are inhabited. *)
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
222
Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
223
Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
224
225
226
227
228
229

(** ** Proof irrelevant types *)
(** This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all
elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions,
but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it. *)
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
230
Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266

(** ** Common properties *)
(** These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical
properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of [(k ++)] it
allows us to write [inj (k ++)] instead of [app_inv_head k]. *)
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A  B) : Prop :=
  inj x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
    (S : relation C) (f : A  B  C) : Prop :=
  inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2)  R1 x1 y1  R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A  B) (g : B  A) : Prop :=
  cancel :  x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :=
  surj y :  x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B  B  A) : Prop :=
  comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
  anti_symm x y : S x y  S y x  R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y  R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomy x y : R x y  x = y  R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.

267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346

Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y  R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.

Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R x1 x2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R' y1 y2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.

Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A  B)
  `{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.

Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
  Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
  intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. exists (g y). auto. Qed.

(** The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism. *)
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.

(** ** Generic orders *)
(** The classes [PreOrder], [PartialOrder], and [TotalOrder] use an arbitrary
relation [R] instead of [⊆] to support multiple orders on the same type. *)
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y  ¬R Y X.
Instance: Params (@strict) 2.
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
  partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
  total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.

(** * Logic *)
347
348
349
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∧)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∧ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
350

351
352
353
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∨)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∨ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
354

355
356
357
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ↔)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(↔ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371

Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption.

Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q  P  Q  P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P  P  Q  Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q  P)  Q  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P  (P  Q)  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P  Q)  (Q  R)  (P  R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
372
373
374
375
376
377
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420

Instance: Comm () (@eq A).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () (λ x y, @eq A y x).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.


(** * Common data types *)
(** ** Functions *)
421
422
423
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A →)" := (λ B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(→ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
424

425
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
426
427
428
  (at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
429

430
431
432
433
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( f ∘)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
434

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
436
437
Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A  B) :=
  populate (λ _, inhabitant).

438
439
(** Ensure that [simpl] unfolds [id], [compose], and [flip] when fully
applied. *)
440
441
442
443
Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.

Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A'  A) (g: B  B') (h : A  B) : A'  B' :=
  g  h  f.

Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
  Reflexive R2  Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.

Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Inj R1 R2 f  Inj R2 R3 g  Inj R1 R3 (g  f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.

Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; exists y; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Surj (=) f  Surj R g  Surj R (g  f).
Proof.
  intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
  destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. exists z. congruence.
Qed.

Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.

(** ** Lists *)
Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].

Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : list A  list B  list C :=
  fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ => [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).

(** ** Booleans *)
(** The following coercion allows us to use Booleans as propositions. *)
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Hint Unfold Is_true.
Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left.
Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro.
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).

Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
501

502
503
504
505
506
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
507

508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b  ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false  ¬b.
Proof. now intros -> ?. Qed.
516

517
518
519
520
(** ** Unit *)
Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (@equiv unit _).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
521
522
Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
523
Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
524

525
(** ** Products *)
526
527
Notation "( x ,)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(, y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
528

529
530
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
531

532
Instance: Params (@pair) 2.
533
534
Instance: Params (@fst) 2.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2.
535

536
537
538
539
540
541
542
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A  B  C  D) (p : A * B * C) : D :=
  let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A  B  C  D  E) (p : A * B * C * D) : E :=
  let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
543
544
545
546
547
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A * B * C  D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
  f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A * B * C * D  E)
  (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).

548
549
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (p : A * B) : A' * B' :=
  (f (p.1), g (p.2)).
550
Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
551

552
553
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A  A'  A'') (g : B  B'  B'')
    (p : A * B) (q : A' * B') : A'' * B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
554
Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
555

556
557
558
Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
    (iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A * B) :=
  match iA, iB with populate x, populate y => populate (x,y) end.
559

560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
Instance pair_inj : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
  intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
    [apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
568

569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
  relation (A * B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1)  R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
585

586
587
  Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
588
589
  Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
590
591
592
593
594
  Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
595

596
597
Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A * B) := prod_relation () ().
Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
598
599
  Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@pair A B) := _.
Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 () () () (@pair A B) := _.
600
601
602
Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@fst A B) := _.
Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
603

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
604
605
Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A * B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
606

607
(** ** Sums *)
608
609
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
  match xy with inl x => inl (f x) | inr y => inr (g y) end.
610
Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
611

612
Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
613
  match iA with populate x => populate (inl x) end.
614
Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
615
  match iB with populate y => populate (inl y) end.
616

617
618
619
620
Instance inl_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance inr_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
621

622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.

Inductive sum_relation {A B}
     (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
  | inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
  | inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).

Section sum_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
649
650
651
652
  Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
653
654
655
656
657
End sum_relation.

Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation () ().
Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inr A B) := _.
658
659
Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inr A B) := _.
660
661
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.

662
663
(** ** Option *)
Instance option_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (option A) := populate None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
664

665
(** ** Sigma types *)
666
667
668
Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
669

670
671
672
Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
673
674
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
675

676
677
678
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A  Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
  xPx = yPy  x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
679

680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
Section sig_map.
  Context `{P : A  Prop} `{Q : B  Prop} (f : A  B) (Hf :  x, P x  Q (f x)).
  Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x)  Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
  Global Instance sig_map_inj:
    ( x, ProofIrrel (P x))  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
  Proof.
    intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
    apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
  Qed.
End sig_map.
690
Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
691

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692

693
(** * Operations on collections *)
694
(** We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and
695
relations on collections: the empty collection [∅], the union [(∪)],
696
intersection [(∩)], and difference [(∖)], the singleton [{[_]}], the subset
697
[(⊆)] and element of [(∈)] relation, and disjointess [(##)]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698
Class Empty A := empty: A.
699
Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
700
Notation "∅" := empty : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701

702
703
Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate .

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704
Class Union A := union: A  A  A.
705
Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
706
Instance: Params (@union) 2.
707
708
709
710
711
712
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∪)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
713
Infix "∪**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
714
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
715
Infix "∪*∪**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
716
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717

718
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A  A := fold_right () .
719
Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
720
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃  l") : stdpp_scope.
721

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
Class Intersection A := intersection: A  A  A.
723
Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
724
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2.
725
726
727
728
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∩)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729
730

Class Difference A := difference: A  A  A.
731
Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
732
Instance: Params (@difference) 2.
733
734
735
736
737
738
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∖)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
739
Infix "∖**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
740
  (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
741
Infix "∖*∖**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
742
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743

744
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A  B.
745
Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
746
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3.
747
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
748
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
749
  (union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
750
  (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
751
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
752
  (at level 1, y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
753
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
754
  (at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : stdpp_scope.
755

756
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
757
Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
758
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2.
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊆)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊈)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆**" := (Forall2 (*)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1  q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2  q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 * q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 * q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774

775
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
776
777
778
Hint Extern 0 (_ * _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ** _) => reflexivity.

779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
Infix "⊂" := (strict ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊂)" := (strict () X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊄)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787

788
789
790
791
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
792

793
794
795
796
(** The class [Lexico A] is used for the lexicographic order on [A]. This order
is used to create finite maps, finite sets, etc, and is typically different from
the order [(⊆)]. *)
Class Lexico A := lexico: relation A.
797
Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
798

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
799
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A  B  Prop.
800
Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
801
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3.
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∈)" := (elem_of x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈ X )" := (λ x, elem_of x X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "x ∉ X" := (¬x  X) (at level 80) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉)" := (λ x X, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∉)" := (λ X, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∉ X )" := (λ x, x  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
810

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
811
Class Disjoint A := disjoint : A  A  Prop.
812
 Hint Mode Disjoint ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
813
Instance: Params (@disjoint) 2.
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
Infix "##" := disjoint (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##)" := disjoint (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ##.)" := (disjoint X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.## X )" := (λ Y, Y ## X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##*" := (Forall2 (##)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##*)" := (Forall2 (##)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##**" := (Forall2 (##*)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 ## q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 ## q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 ##* q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "##2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 ##* q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
825
826
Hint Extern 0 (_ ## _) => symmetry; eassumption.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ##* _) => symmetry; eassumption.
827
828

Class DisjointE E A := disjointE : E  A  A  Prop.
829
Hint Mode DisjointE - ! : typeclass_instances.
830
Instance: Params (@disjointE) 4.
831
Notation "X ##{ Γ } Y" := (disjointE Γ X Y)
832
833
  (at level 70, format "X  ##{ Γ }  Y") : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(##{ Γ } )" := (disjointE Γ) (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
834
Notation "Xs ##{ Γ }* Ys" := (Forall2 (##{Γ}) Xs Ys)
835
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ##{ Γ }*  Ys") : stdpp_scope.
836
Notation "(##{ Γ }* )" := (Forall2 (##{Γ}))
837
  (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
838
Notation "X ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 } Y" := (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3) X Y)
839
  (at level 70, format "X  ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }  Y") : stdpp_scope.
840
Notation "Xs ##{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }* Ys" :=
841
  (Forall2 (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3)) Xs Ys)
842
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ##{ Γ1 ,  Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }*  Ys") : stdpp_scope.
843
Hint Extern 0 (_ ##{_} _) => symmetry; eassumption.
844
845

Class DisjointList A := disjoint_list : list A  Prop.
846
Hint Mode DisjointList ! : typeclass_instances.
847
Instance: Params (@disjoint_list) 2.
848
Notation "## Xs" := (disjoint_list Xs) (at level 20, format "##  Xs") : stdpp_scope.
849

850
851
Section disjoint_list.
  Context `{Disjoint A, Union A, Empty A}.
852
853
  Implicit Types X : A.

854
  Inductive disjoint_list_default : DisjointList A :=
855
856
    | disjoint_nil_2 : ## (@nil A)
    | disjoint_cons_2 (X : A) (Xs : list A) : X ##  Xs  ## Xs  ## (X :: Xs).
857
  Global Existing Instance disjoint_list_default.
858

859
  Lemma disjoint_list_nil  : ## @nil A  True.
860
  Proof. split; constructor. Qed.
861
  Lemma disjoint_list_cons X Xs : ## (X :: Xs)  X ##  Xs  ## Xs.
862
  Proof. split. inversion_clear 1; auto. intros [??]. constructor; auto. Qed.
863
End disjoint_list.
864
865

Class Filter A B := filter:  (P : A  Prop) `{ x, Decision (P x)}, B  B.
866
Hint Mode Filter - ! : typeclass_instances.
867

868
Class UpClose A B := up_close : A  B.
869
Hint Mode UpClose - ! : typeclass_instances.
870
Notation "↑ x" := (up_close x) (at level 20, format "↑ x").
871
872

(** * Monadic operations *)
873
(** We define operational type classes for the monadic operations bind, join 
874
875
876
and fmap. We use these type classes merely for convenient overloading of
notations and do not formalize any theory on monads (we do not even define a
class with the monad laws). *)
877
Class MRet (M : Type  Type) := mret:  {A}, A  M A.
878
Arguments mret {_ _ _} _ : assert.
879
Instance: Params (@mret) 3.
880
Class MBind (M : Type  Type) := mbind :  {A B}, (A  M B)  M A  M B.
881
Arguments mbind {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
882
Instance: Params (@mbind) 4.
883
Class MJoin (M : Type  Type) := mjoin:  {A}, M (M A)  M A.
884
Arguments mjoin {_ _ _} !_ / : assert.
885
Instance: Params (@mjoin) 3.
886
Class FMap (M : Type  Type) := fmap :  {A B}, (A  B)  M A  M B.
887
Arguments fmap {_ _ _