 28 Oct, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

 25 Oct, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
There are now two proof mode tactics for dealing with modalities:  `iModIntro` : introduction of a modality  `iMod pm_trm as (x1 ... xn) "ipat"` : eliminate a modality The behavior of these tactics can be controlled by instances of the `IntroModal` and `ElimModal` type class. We have declared instances for later, except 0, basic updates and fancy updates. The tactic `iMod` is flexible enough that it can also eliminate an updates around a weakest pre, and so forth. The corresponding introduction patterns of these tactics are `!>` and `>`. These tactics replace the tactics `iUpdIntro`, `iUpd` and `iTimeless`. Source of backwards incompatability: the introduction pattern `!>` is used for introduction of arbitrary modalities. It used to introduce laters by stripping of a later of each hypotheses.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
And also rename the corresponding proof mode tactics.

 10 Oct, 2016 1 commit


Janno authored
Initial proof by JanOliver Kaiser, adapted by Robbert Krebbers.

 05 Oct, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
Before this commit, given "HP" : P and "H" : P ★ Q with Q persistent, one could write: iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP") to eliminate the wand in "H" while keeping the resource "HP". The lemma: own_valid : own γ x ⊢ ✓ x was the prototypical example where this pattern (using the #) was used. However, the pattern was too limited. For example, given "H" : P₁ ★ P₂ ★ Q", one could not write iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP₁") because P₂ ★ Q is not persistent, even when Q is. So, instead, this commit introduces the following tactic: iSpecialize pm_trm as # which allows one to eliminate implications and wands while being able to use all hypotheses to prove the premises, as well as being able to use all hypotheses to prove the resulting goal. In the case of iDestruct, we now check whether all branches of the introduction pattern start with an `#` (moving the hypothesis to the persistent context) or `%` (moving the hypothesis to the pure Coq context). If this is the case, we allow one to use all hypotheses for proving the premises, as well as for proving the resulting goal.

 22 Aug, 2016 1 commit


JacquesHenri Jourdan authored
By using the global ghost maps instead of our own ones.

 09 Aug, 2016 2 commits
 08 Aug, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
This makes stuff more uniform and also removes the need for the [inGFs] type class. Instead, there is now a type class [subG Σ1 Σ2] which expresses that a list of functors [Σ1] is contained in [Σ2].

 05 Aug, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Also make those for introduction and elimination more symmetric: !% pure introduction % pure elimination !# always introduction # always elimination !> later introduction > pat timeless later elimination !==> view shift introduction ==> pat view shift elimination

Robbert Krebbers authored
This commit features:  A simpler model. The recursive domain equation no longer involves a triple containing invariants, physical state and ghost state, but just ghost state. Invariants and physical state are encoded using (higherorder) ghost state.  (Primitive) view shifts are formalized in the logic and all properties about it are proven in the logic instead of the model. Instead, the core logic features only a notion of raw view shifts which internalizing performing frame preserving updates.  A better behaved notion of mask changing view shifts. In particular, we no longer have sideconditions on transitivity of view shifts, and we have a rule for introduction of mask changing view shifts ={E1,E2}=> P with E2 ⊆ E1 which allows to postpone performing a view shift.  The weakest precondition connective is formalized in the logic using Banach's fixpoint. All properties about the connective are proven in the logic instead of directly in the model.  Adequacy is proven in the logic and uses a primitive form of adequacy for uPred that only involves raw views shifts and laters. Some remarks:  I have removed binary view shifts. I did not see a way to describe all rules of the new mask changing view shifts using those.  There is no longer the need for the notion of "frame shifting assertions" and these are thus removed. The rules for Hoare triples are thus also stated in terms of primitive view shifts. TODO:  Maybe rename primitive view shift into something more sensible  Figure out a way to deal with closed proofs (see the commented out stuff in tests/heap_lang and tests/barrier_client).

 27 Jul, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
This way type class inference is not invokved when used in tactics like iPvs while not having to write an @. (Idea suggested by Ralf.)

Robbert Krebbers authored
This way, it won't pick arbitrary (and possibly wrong!) inG instances when multiple ones are available. We achieve this by declaring: Hint Mode inG   + So that type class inference only succeeds when the type of the ghost variable does not include any evars. This required me to make some minor changes throughout the whole development making some types explicit.

 13 Jul, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
The intropattern {H} also meant clear (both in ssreflect, and the logic part of the introduction pattern).

 16 Jun, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
This introduces n hypotheses and destructs the nth one.

Robbert Krebbers authored

 01 Jun, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 31 May, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
↔ . This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →. 
Robbert Krebbers authored
It used to be: (P ={E}=> Q) := (True ⊢ (P → ={E}=> Q)) Now it is: (P ={E}=> Q) := (P ⊢ ={E}=> Q)

 24 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
Changes:  We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P ★ Q whose range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent.  While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This gets rid of the specialization pattern !.  Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following: H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P ★ Q where either P or Q is persistent. % : generate a goal for a pure premise.

 07 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 23 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 15 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 11 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 10 Mar, 2016 2 commits


Ralf Jung authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Thanks to Amin Timany for the suggestion.

 07 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored
Add both nonexpansive and contractive functors, and bundle them for the general Iris instance as well as the global functor construction This allows us to move the \later in the userdefined functor to any place we want. In particular, we can now have "\later (iProp > iProp)" in the ghost CMRA.

 06 Mar, 2016 2 commits
 05 Mar, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Ralf Jung authored
write tactics to move particular assertions to the front, and to introduce a (*) while taking paticular assertions to the left/right

Ralf Jung authored

 02 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
This cleans up some adhoc stuff and prepares for a generalization of saved propositions.

 01 Mar, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 25 Feb, 2016 2 commits